[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants
From: |
no-reply |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:59:38 -0800 (PST) |
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/address@hidden/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants
Type: series
Message-id: address@hidden
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0
git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
git config --local diff.renames True
git config --local diff.algorithm histogram
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base..
=== TEST SCRIPT END ===
Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
- [tag update] patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
- [tag update] patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
Switched to a new branch 'test'
414a63f s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants
40c0719 s390x/cpumodels: Factor out CPU feature dependencies
=== OUTPUT BEGIN ===
1/2 Checking commit 40c07194c720 (s390x/cpumodels: Factor out CPU feature
dependencies)
2/2 Checking commit 414a63fe401d (s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model
variants)
ERROR: line over 90 characters
#167: FILE: target/s390x/cpu_models.c:1311:
+ xcc->desc = g_strdup_printf("%s with best features supported by the
accelerator in the current host",
total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 152 lines checked
Patch 2/2 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
=== OUTPUT END ===
Test command exited with code: 1
The full log is available at
http://patchew.org/logs/address@hidden/testing.checkpatch/?type=message.
---
Email generated automatically by Patchew [https://patchew.org/].
Please send your feedback to address@hidden
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, Peter Maydell, 2019/11/18
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, Eduardo Habkost, 2019/11/18
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, Peter Maydell, 2019/11/19
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/19
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, Peter Maydell, 2019/11/19
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/19
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, Eduardo Habkost, 2019/11/19
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/20
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, Eduardo Habkost, 2019/11/20
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants, David Hildenbrand, 2019/11/20
Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] s390x/cpumodel: Introduce "best" model variants,
no-reply <=