[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] Acceptance test: add "boot_linux" tests
From: |
Wainer dos Santos Moschetta |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] Acceptance test: add "boot_linux" tests |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Nov 2019 17:42:14 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 11/4/19 1:13 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
This acceptance test, validates that a full blown Linux guest can
successfully boot in QEMU. In this specific case, the guest chosen is
Fedora version 31.
* x86_64, pc and q35 machine types, with and without kvm as an
accellerator
* aarch64 and virt machine type, with and without kvm as an
accellerator
* ppc64 and pseries machine type
* s390x and s390-ccw-virtio machine type
The method for checking the successful boot is based on "cloudinit"
and its "phone home" feature. The guest is given an ISO image
with the location of the phone home server, and the information to
post (the instance ID). Upon receiving the correct information,
from the guest, the test is considered to have PASSed.
This test is currently limited to user mode networking only, and
instructs the guest to connect to the "router" address that is hard
coded in QEMU.
To create the cloudinit ISO image that will be used to configure the
guest, the pycdlib library is also required and has been added as
requirement to the virtual environment created by "check-venv".
The console output is read by a separate thread, by means of the
Avocado datadrainer utility module.
Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <address@hidden>
---
tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/requirements.txt | 1 +
2 files changed, 176 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py
diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..882f7dc5df
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+# Functional test that boots a complete Linux system via a cloud image
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2018-2019 Red Hat, Inc.
+#
+# Author:
+# Cleber Rosa <address@hidden>
+#
+# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
+# later. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
+
+import os
+
+from avocado_qemu import Test, SRC_ROOT_DIR
+
+from qemu import kvm_available
+
+from avocado.utils import cloudinit
+from avocado.utils import network
+from avocado.utils import vmimage
+from avocado.utils import datadrainer
+
+
+KVM_NOT_AVAILABLE = "KVM accelerator does not seem to be available"
+
+
+class BootLinux(Test):
+ """
+ Boots a Linux system, checking for a successful initialization
+ """
+
+ timeout = 600
+ chksum = None
+
+ def setUp(self):
+ super(BootLinux, self).setUp()
+ self.prepare_boot()
+ self.vm.add_args('-smp', '2')
+ self.vm.add_args('-m', '2048')
+ self.vm.add_args('-drive', 'file=%s' % self.boot.path)
+ self.prepare_cloudinit()
+
+ def prepare_boot(self):
+ self.log.info('Downloading/preparing boot image')
Cosmetic: replace 'Downloading/preparing' with 'Downloading' since this
function does only download the boot image.
+ # Fedora 31 only provides ppc64le images
+ image_arch = self.arch
+ if image_arch == 'ppc64':
+ image_arch = 'ppc64le'
+ try:
+ self.boot = vmimage.get(
+ 'fedora', arch=image_arch, version='31',
+ checksum=self.chksum,
+ algorithm='sha256',
+ cache_dir=self.cache_dirs[0],
+ snapshot_dir=self.workdir)
+ except:
+ self.cancel('Failed to download/prepare boot image')
Likewise.
+
+ def prepare_cloudinit(self):
+ self.log.info('Preparing cloudinit image')
+ try:
+ cloudinit_iso = os.path.join(self.workdir, 'cloudinit.iso')
+ self.phone_home_port = network.find_free_port()
+ cloudinit.iso(cloudinit_iso, self.name,
+ username='root',
+ password='password',
+ # QEMU's hard coded usermode router address
+ phone_home_host='10.0.2.2',
+ phone_home_port=self.phone_home_port)
+ self.vm.add_args('-drive', 'file=%s,format=raw' % cloudinit_iso)
+ except Exception:
+ self.cancel('Failed to prepared cloudinit image')
+
+ def launch_and_wait(self):
+ self.vm.set_console()
+ self.vm.launch()
+ console_drainer =
datadrainer.LineLogger(self.vm.console_socket.fileno(),
+
logger=self.log.getChild('console'))
+ console_drainer.start()
+ self.log.info('VM launched, waiting for boot confirmation from guest')
+ cloudinit.wait_for_phone_home(('0.0.0.0', self.phone_home_port),
self.name)
+
+
+class BootLinuxX8664(BootLinux):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=arch:x86_64
+ """
+
+ chksum = 'e3c1b309d9203604922d6e255c2c5d098a309c2d46215d8fc026954f3c5c27a0'
+
+ def test_pc(self):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=machine:pc
+ """
+ self.launch_and_wait()
+
+ def test_kvm_pc(self):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=machine:pc
+ :avocado: tags=accel:kvm
+ """
+ if not kvm_available(self.arch):
+ self.cancel(KVM_NOT_AVAILABLE)
kvm_available() solely checks for kvm presence on host, not if enabled
in the target binary. That said, as a follow up we could adapt this test
to use a strengthen approach as I proposed in patch 02 of '[PATCH 0/3]
Acceptance tests: boot Linux with KVM test' [1] series.
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg627498.html
+ self.vm.add_args("-accel", "kvm")
+ self.launch_and_wait()
+
+ def test_q35(self):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=machine:q35
+ """
+ self.launch_and_wait()
+
+ def test_kvm_q35(self):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=machine:q35
+ :avocado: tags=accel:kvm
+ """
+ if not kvm_available(self.arch):
+ self.cancel(KVM_NOT_AVAILABLE)
+ self.vm.add_args("-accel", "kvm")
+ self.launch_and_wait()
+
+
+class BootLinuxAarch64(BootLinux):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=arch:aarch64
+ :avocado: tags=machine:virt
+ """
+
+ chksum = '1e18d9c0cf734940c4b5d5ec592facaed2af0ad0329383d5639c997fdf16fe49'
+
+ def test_virt(self):
+ self.vm.add_args('-cpu', 'cortex-a53')
+ self.vm.add_args('-bios',
+ os.path.join(SRC_ROOT_DIR, 'pc-bios',
+ 'edk2-aarch64-code.fd'))
+ self.vm.add_args('-device', 'virtio-rng-pci,rng=rng0')
+ self.vm.add_args('-object', 'rng-random,id=rng0,filename=/dev/urandom')
+ self.launch_and_wait()
+
+ def test_kvm_virt(self):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=accel:kvm
+ """
+ if not kvm_available(self.arch):
+ self.cancel(KVM_NOT_AVAILABLE)
+ self.vm.add_args("-accel", "kvm")
+ self.test_virt()
+
+
+class BootLinuxPPC64(BootLinux):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=arch:ppc64
+ """
+
+ chksum = '7c3528b85a3df4b2306e892199a9e1e43f991c506f2cc390dc4efa2026ad2f58'
+
+ def test_pseries(self):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=machine:pseries
+ """
+ self.launch_and_wait()
+
+
+class BootLinuxS390X(BootLinux):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=arch:s390x
+ """
+
+ chksum = '4caaab5a434fd4d1079149a072fdc7891e354f834d355069ca982fdcaf5a122d'
+
+ def test_s390_ccw_virtio(self):
+ """
+ :avocado: tags=machine:s390-ccw-virtio
+ """
+ self.launch_and_wait()
diff --git a/tests/requirements.txt b/tests/requirements.txt
index a2a587223a..3893361e0c 100644
--- a/tests/requirements.txt
+++ b/tests/requirements.txt
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
# in the tests/venv Python virtual environment. For more info,
# refer to: https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/user_guide/#id1
avocado-framework==72.0
+pycdlib==1.8.0
Besides the cosmetics suggestions, this test is ready to go.
In other to write powerful tests there will be needed a mechanism to
boot a full blown guest which can be interacted with. I see the proposed
BootLinux class here as the first milestone towards that goal. Another
reason to merge this as soon as possible.
Ran the tests on my x86_68 machine with RHEL 8.1, and all pass
(BootLinuxAarch64.test_kvm_virt correctly skipped).
Reviewed-by: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <address@hidden>
Thanks,
Wainer
- Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] Acceptance tests: add the build directory to the system PATH, (continued)
Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] Acceptance tests: add the build directory to the system PATH, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/11/08
[PATCH v7 7/8] Acceptance tests: depend on qemu-img, Cleber Rosa, 2019/11/04
[PATCH v7 8/8] Acceptance test: add "boot_linux" tests, Cleber Rosa, 2019/11/04
Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Acceptance test: Add "boot_linux" acceptance test, no-reply, 2019/11/04
Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Acceptance test: Add "boot_linux" acceptance test, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta, 2019/11/07