|
From: | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] misc/pca9552: Add qom set and get |
Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:57:16 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 11/19/19 5:27 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 18/11/2019 18:48, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:Odd... I only received Cédric answer, not Joel patch. On 11/18/19 11:00 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:On 18/11/2019 07:17, Joel Stanley wrote:Following the pattern of the work recently done with the ASPEED GPIO model, this adds support for inspecting and modifying the PCA9552 LEDs from the monitor. (qemu) qom-set /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 on (qemu) qom-get /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 "on" (qemu) qom-set /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 off (qemu) qom-get /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 "off" (qemu) qom-set /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 pwm0 (qemu) qom-get /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 "pwm0" (qemu) qom-set /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 pwm1 (qemu) qom-get /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 "pwm1"It would be nice to revive the QOM get patchset from David. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/666458/ Did we reach some consensus ?Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <address@hidden>Some comments below.--- The qom device in mainline qemu is a different path. Using the monitor examine `info qom-tree /machine/unattached/` to discover it. This can be tested with a Witherspoon image. $ wget https://openpower.xyz/job/openbmc-build/distro=ubuntu,label=builder,target=witherspoon/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/deploy/images/witherspoon/obmc-phosphor-image-witherspoon.ubi.mtd $ qemu-system-arm -M witherspoon-bmc -serial pty -monitor pty -nographic \ -drive file=obmc-phosphor-image-witherspoon.ubi.mtd,format=raw,if=mtd char device redirected to /dev/pts/5 (label compat_monitor0) char device redirected to /dev/pts/10 (label serial0) $ screen /dev/pts/5 QEMU 4.1.91 monitor - type 'help' for more information (qemu) qom-get /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 "off" $ screen /dev/pts/19 root@witherspoon:~# cd /sys/class/gpio/ root@witherspoon:/sys/class/gpio# echo 248 > export root@witherspoon:/sys/class/gpio# cat gpio248/value 0 (qemu) qom-set /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 on root@witherspoon:/sys/class/gpio# echo out > gpio248/direction root@witherspoon:/sys/class/gpio# cat gpio248/value 1 (qemu) qom-get /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 "on" (qemu) qom-set /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 off (qemu) qom-get /machine/unattached/device[17] led0 "off" root@witherspoon:/sys/class/gpio# cat gpio248/value 0I am assuming this is 5.0 material. This is a good starting point, and is useful. However this would be useful for other boards/devices too. What about defining a InterfaceInfo[] for external GPIOs?The code below is very specific to pca9552.
Yes, sorry if I was unclear, I don't want to delay this series, I was just thinking about other uses.
What kind of interface do you have in mind more precisely ? which handlers ?
Here we expose the devices GPIOs (as output) so they can be modified via QMP.
A QMP client could subscribe to GPIOs input events (or IRQ triggered).(The PCA9552 can also use the 16 lines as input, but Joel added a "input line behaviour not modeled" comment below).
Maybe the PCA9552 isn't the best example for my generic use case, because it is already "out of the soc/board" being on a bus.
I'm more concerned about a generic QMP way to access GPIOs from a SoC exposed to a physical user of a board.
Shouldn't we use the qemu_irq type for that then?Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <address@hidden> --- hw/misc/pca9552.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/misc/pca9552.c b/hw/misc/pca9552.c index 73be28d9369c..0362aac8c862 100644 --- a/hw/misc/pca9552.c +++ b/hw/misc/pca9552.c @@ -15,12 +15,16 @@ #include "hw/misc/pca9552.h" #include "hw/misc/pca9552_regs.h" #include "migration/vmstate.h" +#include "qapi/error.h" +#include "qapi/visitor.h" #define PCA9552_LED_ON 0x0 #define PCA9552_LED_OFF 0x1 #define PCA9552_LED_PWM0 0x2 #define PCA9552_LED_PWM1 0x3 +static const char *led_state[] = {"on", "off", "pwm0", "pwm1"};BTW "pwm0/pwm1" as "state" is confuse, but I understand this is how the PCA9552 datasheet describes it.+ static uint8_t pca9552_pin_get_config(PCA9552State *s, int pin) { uint8_t reg = PCA9552_LS0 + (pin / 4); @@ -169,6 +173,84 @@ static int pca9552_event(I2CSlave *i2c, enum i2c_event event) return 0; } +static void pca9552_get_led(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, + void *opaque, Error **errp) +{ + PCA9552State *s = PCA9552(obj); + int led, rc, reg; + char *str; + uint8_t state; + + rc = sscanf(name, "led%2d", &led); + if (rc != 1) { + error_setg(errp, "%s: error reading %s", __func__, name); + return; + } + if (led < 0 || led > s->nr_leds) { + error_setg(errp, "%s invalid led %s", __func__, name); + return; + } + /* + * Get the LSx register as the qom interface should expose the device + * state, not the modeled 'input line' behaviour which would come from + * reading the INPUTx reg + */ + reg = PCA9552_LS0 + led / 4; + state = (pca9552_read(s, reg) >> (led % 8)) & 0x3;Could we add accessors to extract the register fields and to clarify the layout ?+ str = g_strdup(led_state[state]); + visit_type_str(v, name, &str, errp); +} + +/* + * Return an LED selector register value based on an existing one, with + * the appropriate 2-bit state value set for the given LED number (0-3). + */ +static inline uint8_t pca955x_ledsel(uint8_t oldval, int led_num, int state) +{ + return (oldval & (~(0x3 << (led_num << 1)))) | + ((state & 0x3) << (led_num << 1)); +} + +static void pca9552_set_led(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, + void *opaque, Error **errp) +{ + PCA9552State *s = PCA9552(obj); + Error *local_err = NULL; + int led, rc, reg, val; + uint8_t state; + char *state_str; + + visit_type_str(v, name, &state_str, &local_err); + if (local_err) { + error_propagate(errp, local_err); + return; + } + rc = sscanf(name, "led%2d", &led); + if (rc != 1) { + error_setg(errp, "%s: error reading %s", __func__, name); + return; + } + if (led < 0 || led > s->nr_leds) { + error_setg(errp, "%s invalid led %s", __func__, name); + return; + } + + for (state = 0; state < ARRAY_SIZE(led_state); state++) { + if (!strcmp(state_str, led_state[state])) { + break; + } + } + if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(led_state)) { + error_setg(errp, "%s invalid led state %s", __func__, state_str); + return; + } + + reg = PCA9552_LS0 + led / 4; + val = pca9552_read(s, reg); + val = pca955x_ledsel(val, led % 4, state); + pca9552_write(s, reg, val); +} + static const VMStateDescription pca9552_vmstate = { .name = "PCA9552", .version_id = 0, @@ -204,6 +286,7 @@ static void pca9552_reset(DeviceState *dev) static void pca9552_initfn(Object *obj) { PCA9552State *s = PCA9552(obj); + int led; /* If support for the other PCA955X devices are implemented, these * constant values might be part of class structure describing the @@ -211,6 +294,14 @@ static void pca9552_initfn(Object *obj) */ s->max_reg = PCA9552_LS3; s->nr_leds = 16; + + for (led = 0; led < s->nr_leds; led++) { + char *name; + + name = g_strdup_printf("led%d", led); + object_property_add(obj, name, "bool", pca9552_get_led, pca9552_set_led, + NULL, NULL, NULL);It misses a : g_free(name) C.+ } } static void pca9552_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |