[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RESEND PATCH v21 2/6] docs: APEI GHES generation and CPER record de
From: |
Xiang Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [RESEND PATCH v21 2/6] docs: APEI GHES generation and CPER record description |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:37:57 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 |
Hi Igor,
Thanks for your review!
Since the series of patches are going to be merged, we will address your
comments by follow up patches.
On 2019/11/15 17:44, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:40:44 +0800
> Xiang Zheng <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> From: Dongjiu Geng <address@hidden>
>>
>> Add APEI/GHES detailed design document
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiang Zheng <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> docs/specs/index.rst | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst b/docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..348825f9d3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst
>> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
>> +APEI tables generating and CPER record
>> +======================================
>> +
>> +..
>> + Copyright (c) 2019 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
>> +
>> + This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
>> + See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
>> +
>> +Design Details
>> +--------------
>> +
>> +::
>> +
>> + etc/acpi/tables etc/hardware_errors
>> + ====================
>> ==========================================
>> + + +--------------------------+ +-----------------------+
>> + | | HEST | | address |
>> +--------------+
>> + | +--------------------------+ | registers |
>> | Error Status |
>> + | | GHES1 | | +---------------------+
>> | Data Block 1 |
>> + | +--------------------------+ +--------->| |error_block_address1
>> |----------->| +------------+
>> + | | ................. | | | +---------------------+
>> | | CPER |
>> + | | error_status_address-----+-+ +------->| |error_block_address2
>> |--------+ | | CPER |
>> + | | ................. | | | +---------------------+
>> | | | .... |
>> + | | read_ack_register--------+-+ | | | .............. |
>> | | | CPER |
>> + | | read_ack_preserve | | | +-----------------------+
>> | | +------------+
>> + | | read_ack_write | | | +----->| |error_block_addressN
>> |------+ | | Error Status |
>> + + +--------------------------+ | | | | +---------------------+
>> | | | Data Block 2 |
>> + | | GHES2 | +-+-+----->| |read_ack_register1 |
>> | +-->| +------------+
>> + + +--------------------------+ | | | +---------------------+
>> | | | CPER |
>> + | | ................. | | | +--->| |read_ack_register2 |
>> | | | CPER |
>> + | | error_status_address-----+---+ | | | +---------------------+
>> | | | .... |
>> + | | ................. | | | | | ............. |
>> | | | CPER |
>> + | | read_ack_register--------+-----+-+ | +---------------------+
>> | +-+------------+
>> + | | read_ack_preserve | | +->| |read_ack_registerN |
>> | | |.......... |
>> + | | read_ack_write | | | | +---------------------+
>> | | +------------+
>> + + +--------------------------| | |
>> | | Error Status |
>> + | | ............... | | |
>> | | Data Block N |
>> + + +--------------------------+ | |
>> +---->| +------------+
>> + | | GHESN | | |
>> | | CPER |
>> + + +--------------------------+ | |
>> | | CPER |
>> + | | ................. | | |
>> | | .... |
>> + | | error_status_address-----+-----+ |
>> | | CPER |
>> + | | ................. | |
>> +-+------------+
>> + | | read_ack_register--------+---------+
>> + | | read_ack_preserve |
>> + | | read_ack_write |
>> + + +--------------------------+
>
> I'd merge "Error Status Data Block" with "address registers", so it would be
> clear that "Error Status Data Block" is located after "read_ack_registerN"
Yes, this image doesn't demonstrate this point. We will make some changes on
this image.
>
>> +
>> +(1) QEMU generates the ACPI HEST table. This table goes in the current
>> + "etc/acpi/tables" fw_cfg blob. Each error source has different
>> + notification types.
>> +
>> +(2) A new fw_cfg blob called "etc/hardware_errors" is introduced. QEMU
>> + also needs to populate this blob. The "etc/hardware_errors" fw_cfg blob
>> + contains an address registers table and an Error Status Data Block
>> table.
>> +
>> +(3) The address registers table contains N Error Block Address entries
>> + and N Read Ack Register entries. The size for each entry is 8-byte.
>> + The Error Status Data Block table contains N Error Status Data Block
>> + entries. The size for each entry is 4096(0x1000) bytes. The total size
>> + for the "etc/hardware_errors" fw_cfg blob is (N * 8 * 2 + N * 4096)
>> bytes.
>> + N is the number of the kinds of hardware error sources.
>> +
>> +(4) QEMU generates the ACPI linker/loader script for the firmware. The
>> + firmware pre-allocates memory for "etc/acpi/tables",
>> "etc/hardware_errors"
>> + and copies blob contents there.
>> +
>> +(5) QEMU generates N ADD_POINTER commands, which patch addresses in the
>> + "error_status_address" fields of the HEST table with a pointer to the
>> + corresponding "address registers" in the "etc/hardware_errors" blob.
>> +
>> +(6) QEMU generates N ADD_POINTER commands, which patch addresses in the
>> + "read_ack_register" fields of the HEST table with a pointer to the
>> + corresponding "address registers" in the "etc/hardware_errors" blob.
>
> s/"address registers" in/"read_ack_register" within/
OK.
>
>> +
>> +(7) QEMU generates N ADD_POINTER commands for the firmware, which patch
>> + addresses in the "error_block_address" fields with a pointer to the
>> + respective "Error Status Data Block" in the "etc/hardware_errors" blob.
>> +
>> +(8) QEMU defines a third and write-only fw_cfg blob which is called
>> + "etc/hardware_errors_addr". Through that blob, the firmware can send
>> back
>> + the guest-side allocation addresses to QEMU. The
>> "etc/hardware_errors_addr"
>> + blob contains a 8-byte entry. QEMU generates a single WRITE_POINTER
>> command
>> + for the firmware. The firmware will write back the start address of
>> + "etc/hardware_errors" blob to the fw_cfg file
>> "etc/hardware_errors_addr".
>> +
>
>> +(9) When QEMU gets a SIGBUS from the kernel, QEMU formats the CPER right
>> into
>> + guest memory,
>
> s/
> QEMU formats the CPER right into guest memory
> /
> QEMU writes CPER into corresponding "Error Status Data Block"
> /
>
OK.
>> and then injects platform specific interrupt (in case of
>> + arm/virt machine it's Synchronous External Abort) as a notification
>> which
>> + is necessary for notifying the guest.
>
>
>> +
>> +(10) This notification (in virtual hardware) will be handled by the guest
>> + kernel, guest APEI driver will read the CPER which is recorded by QEMU
>> and
>> + do the recovery.
> Maybe better would be to say:
> "
> On receiving notification, guest APEI driver cold read the CPER error
> and take appropriate action
> "
OK.
>
>
> also in HEST patches there is implicit ABI, which probably should be
> documented here.
> More specifically kvm_arch_on_sigbus_vcpu() error injection
> uses source_id as index in "etc/hardware_errors" to find out "Error Status
> Data Block"
> entry corresponding to error source. So supported source_id values should be
> assigned
> here and not be changed afterwards to make sure that guest will write error
> into
> expected "Error Status Data Block" even if guest was migrated to a newer QEMU.
>
OK, I will add the descriptions of the implicit ABI.
--
Thanks,
Xiang
Re: [RESEND PATCH v21 5/6] target-arm: kvm64: handle SIGBUS signal from kernel or KVM, Beata Michalska, 2019/11/22