qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: Fix cpu normal reset ri clearing


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: Fix cpu normal reset ri clearing
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:07:13 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0


On 02.12.19 15:01, Janosch Frank wrote:
> As it turns out we need to clear the ri controls and PSW enablement
> bit to be architecture compliant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/s390x/cpu.c | 5 +++++
>  target/s390x/cpu.h | 7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> index 906285888e..c192e6b3b9 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ static void s390_cpu_reset(CPUState *s, cpu_reset_type 
> type)
>                                    &env->fpu_status);
>         /* fall through */

As this is a fall through, do we want to change the INITIAL RESET to only clear 
up to 
start_normal_reset_fields, e.g. something like this on top

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
index 829ce6ad5491..58ac721687a9 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_reset(CPUState *s, cpu_reset_type type)
     case S390_CPU_RESET_INITIAL:
         /* initial reset does not clear everything! */
         memset(&env->start_initial_reset_fields, 0,
-               offsetof(CPUS390XState, end_reset_fields) -
+               offsetof(CPUS390XState, start_normal_reset_fields) -
                offsetof(CPUS390XState, start_initial_reset_fields));
 
         /* architectured initial value for Breaking-Event-Address register */


to avoid double memsetting. 


Other than this question
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>


>      case S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL:
> +        env->psw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_RI;
> +        memset(&env->start_normal_reset_fields, 0,
> +               offsetof(CPUS390XState, end_reset_fields) -
> +               offsetof(CPUS390XState, start_normal_reset_fields));
> +
>          env->pfault_token = -1UL;
>          env->bpbc = false;
>          break;
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index d5e18b096e..7f5fa1d35b 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ struct CPUS390XState {
>       */
>      uint64_t vregs[32][2] QEMU_ALIGNED(16);  /* vector registers */
>      uint32_t aregs[16];    /* access registers */
> -    uint8_t riccb[64];     /* runtime instrumentation control */
>      uint64_t gscb[4];      /* guarded storage control */
>      uint64_t etoken;       /* etoken */
>      uint64_t etoken_extension; /* etoken extension */
> @@ -114,6 +113,10 @@ struct CPUS390XState {
>      uint64_t gbea;
>      uint64_t pp;
>  
> +    /* Fields up to this point are not cleared by normal CPU reset */
> +    struct {} start_normal_reset_fields;
> +    uint8_t riccb[64];     /* runtime instrumentation control */
> +
>      /* Fields up to this point are cleared by a CPU reset */
>      struct {} end_reset_fields;
>  
> @@ -252,6 +255,7 @@ extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_s390_cpu;
>  #undef PSW_SHIFT_ASC
>  #undef PSW_MASK_CC
>  #undef PSW_MASK_PM
> +#undef PSW_MASK_RI
>  #undef PSW_SHIFT_MASK_PM
>  #undef PSW_MASK_64
>  #undef PSW_MASK_32
> @@ -274,6 +278,7 @@ extern const VMStateDescription vmstate_s390_cpu;
>  #define PSW_MASK_CC             0x0000300000000000ULL
>  #define PSW_MASK_PM             0x00000F0000000000ULL
>  #define PSW_SHIFT_MASK_PM       40
> +#define PSW_MASK_RI             0x0000008000000000ULL
>  #define PSW_MASK_64             0x0000000100000000ULL
>  #define PSW_MASK_32             0x0000000080000000ULL
>  #define PSW_MASK_ESA_ADDR       0x000000007fffffffULL
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]