qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ppc/pnv: populate the DT with realized XSCOM devices


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ppc/pnv: populate the DT with realized XSCOM devices
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:08:32 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1

On 10/12/2019 17:53, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:58:45 +0100
> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Some devices could be initialized in the instance_init handler but not
>> realized for configuration reasons. Nodes should not be added in the DT
>> for such devices.
>>
> 
> Do you have examples of such devices to share ?

PHB4 again. 

C. 


> 
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c | 5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> index 006d87e970d9..6d3745a49e50 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> @@ -272,7 +272,10 @@ static int xscom_dt_child(Object *child, void *opaque)
>>          PnvXScomInterface *xd = PNV_XSCOM_INTERFACE(child);
>>          PnvXScomInterfaceClass *xc = PNV_XSCOM_INTERFACE_GET_CLASS(xd);
>>  
>> -        if (xc->dt_xscom) {
>> +        /*
>> +         * Only "realized" devices should be configured in the DT
>> +         */
>> +        if (xc->dt_xscom && DEVICE(child)->realized) {
>>              _FDT((xc->dt_xscom(xd, args->fdt, args->xscom_offset)));
>>          }
>>      }
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]