qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] vhost-vsock: report QMP event whensetrunning


From: ning.bo9
Subject: Re:[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] vhost-vsock: report QMP event whensetrunning
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:11:54 +0800 (CST)

> This can be done efficiently as follows:
> 1. kata-runtime listens on a vsock port
> 2. kata-agent-port=PORT is added to the kernel command-line options
> 3. kata-agent parses the port number and connects to the host
> 
> This eliminates the reconnection attempts.

There will be an additional problem if do this:
Who decides which port the `runtime` should listen?

Consider the worst case: 
The ports selected by two `runtime` running in parallel always conflict, 
and this case is unavoidable, even if we can reduce the possibility of 
conflicts through algorithms.
Because we don't have a daemon that can allocate unique port to `runtime`.


> Userspace APIs to avoid the 2 second wait already exist:
> 
> 1. The SO_VM_SOCKETS_CONNECT_TIMEOUT socket option controls the connect
>    timeout for this socket.

Yes, it has the same effect

> 2. Non-blocking connect allows the userspace process to do other things
>    while a connection attempt is being made.

I don't think the `tunime` has anything to do except wait for the response from 
the `agent` at that moment



Now let me sort out the currently known methods:
1. `runtime` does not connect until it receives the qmp event reported by qemu 
when the `agent` opens the vsock device.
    - The method looks inappropriate now.
2. adding a special case for vhost_vsock.ko.
    - Also inappropriate.
3. connect to `runtime` from `agent`.
    - `runtime` may not be able to choose the right port.
4. Use `SO_VM_SOCKETS_CONNECT_TIMEOUT` option.
    - The effect is similar to method 2, no need to modify the kernel module 
code.

I have an additional question:
If useing method 4, when `runtime` calls connect use NONBLOCK option with very 
short timeout in an infinite loop, the kernel maybe frequently creates timers. 
Is there any other side effects?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]