qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] linux-user:Fix align mistake when mmap guest space


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-user:Fix align mistake when mmap guest space
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:04:46 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2

On 12/12/19 11:00 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 13/12/2019 à 03:29, Xinyu Li a écrit :
>> In init_guest_space, we need to mmap guest space. If the return address
>> of first mmap is not aligned with align, which was set to MAX(SHMLBA,
>> qemu_host_page_size), we need unmap and a new mmap(space is larger than
>> first size). The new size is named real_size, which is aligned_size +
>> qemu_host_page_size. alugned_size is the guest space size. And add a
>> qemu_host_page_size to avoid memory error when we align real_start
>> manually (ROUND_UP(real_start, align)). But when SHMLBA >
>> qemu_host_page_size, the added size will smaller than the size to align,
>> which can make a mistake(in a mips machine, it appears). So change
>> real_size from aligned_size +qemu_host_page_size
>> to aligned_size + align will solve it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xinyu Li <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  linux-user/elfload.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-user/elfload.c b/linux-user/elfload.c
>> index f6693e5760..312ded0779 100644
>> --- a/linux-user/elfload.c
>> +++ b/linux-user/elfload.c
>> @@ -2189,7 +2189,7 @@ unsigned long init_guest_space(unsigned long 
>> host_start,
>>               * to where we need to put the commpage.
>>               */
>>              munmap((void *)real_start, host_size);
>> -            real_size = aligned_size + qemu_host_page_size;
>> +            real_size = aligned_size + align;
>>              real_start = (unsigned long)
>>                  mmap((void *)real_start, real_size, PROT_NONE, flags, -1, 
>> 0);
>>              if (real_start == (unsigned long)-1) {
>>
> 
> Your change seems correct to me.
> 
> Richard did you miss this in your patch
> 30ab9ef2967d ("linux-user: Fix shmat emulation by honoring host SHMLBA")
> or was it voluntary to keep it?

Looks like I missed it.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>


r~




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]