qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] target/i386/cpu: Fix memleak in x86_cpu_class_check


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] target/i386/cpu: Fix memleak in x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:03:06 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)

Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com> writes:

> 'err' forgot to free in x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features error path.
> Fix that.
>
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com>
> ---
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> ---
> - V2: no changes in v2.
> ---
>  target/i386/cpu.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 588f32e136..4678aac0b4 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -4872,6 +4872,7 @@ static void 
> x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features(X86CPUClass *xcc,
       x86_cpu_expand_features(xc, &err);
       if (err) {
           /* Errors at x86_cpu_expand_features should never happen,
            * but in case it does, just report the model as not
            * runnable at all using the "type" property.
            */
           strList *new = g_new0(strList, 1);
>          new->value = g_strdup("type");
>          *next = new;
>          next = &new->next;
> +        error_free(err);
>      }
>  
>      x86_cpu_filter_features(xc, false);

Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

Recommended cleanup: change x86_cpu_filter_features() to return true on
success, false on failure, then pass NULL here and check the return
value.  Can be done on top.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]