qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus: handle wraparound in cirrus_invalidate_region


From: Li Qiang
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus: handle wraparound in cirrus_invalidate_region
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 22:18:52 +0800

Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> 于2020年9月1日周二 下午10:12写道:
>
> Code simply asserts that there is no wraparound instead of handling
> it properly.  The assert() can be triggered by the guest (must be
> privilidged inside the guest though).  Fix it.
>
> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1880189
> Cc: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
> Reported-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>

> ---
>  hw/display/cirrus_vga.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c b/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c
> index 212d6f5e6145..5d1f62e50e67 100644
> --- a/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c
> +++ b/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c
> @@ -640,10 +640,16 @@ static void cirrus_invalidate_region(CirrusVGAState * 
> s, int off_begin,
>      }
>
>      for (y = 0; y < lines; y++) {
> -        off_cur = off_begin;
> +        off_cur = off_begin & s->cirrus_addr_mask;
>          off_cur_end = ((off_cur + bytesperline - 1) & s->cirrus_addr_mask) + 
> 1;
> -        assert(off_cur_end >= off_cur);
> -        memory_region_set_dirty(&s->vga.vram, off_cur, off_cur_end - 
> off_cur);
> +        if (off_cur_end >= off_cur) {
> +            memory_region_set_dirty(&s->vga.vram, off_cur, off_cur_end - 
> off_cur);
> +        } else {
> +            /* wraparound */
> +            memory_region_set_dirty(&s->vga.vram, off_cur,
> +                                    s->cirrus_addr_mask + 1 - off_cur);
> +            memory_region_set_dirty(&s->vga.vram, 0, off_cur_end);
> +        }
>          off_begin += off_pitch;
>      }
>  }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]