qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL v2 00/15] Cirrus-CI improvements, and other CI-related fixes,


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PULL v2 00/15] Cirrus-CI improvements, and other CI-related fixes, m68k
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 07:11:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 02/09/2020 22.19, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 16:49, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Peter,
>>
>> the following changes since commit 887adde81d1f1f3897f1688d37ec6851b4fdad86:
>>
>>   Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/bonzini-gitlab/tags/for-upstream' 
>> into staging (2020-09-01 22:50:23 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>>   https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu.git tags/pull-request-2020-09-02
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 5e560e07ca396e16150740ae3c46b35a85f59ba7:
>>
>>   gitlab-ci.yml: Set artifacts expiration time (2020-09-02 16:23:55 +0200)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> * Cirrus-CI improvements and fixes (compile with -Werror & fix for 1h 
>> problem)
>> * Two build system fixes to fix some failures the CI
>> * One m68k QOMification patch
>> * Some trivial qtest patches
>> * Some small improvements for the Gitlab CI
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Failures on windows crossbuild and OSX:
> 
> Generating qemu-version.h with a meson_exe.py custom command
> Generating ar with a custom command
> cp: '../../pc-bios/keymaps/ar' and 'pc-bios/keymaps/ar' are the same file
> Generating bepo with a custom command
> cp: '../../pc-bios/keymaps/bepo' and 'pc-bios/keymaps/bepo' are the same file
> Makefile.ninja:5177: recipe for target 'pc-bios/keymaps/ar.stamp' failed
[...]
> This is the same set of errors I got from when Gerd put
> the "meson: fix keymaps witout qemu-keymap" patch in his UI pullreq:
>   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg00149.html
> so that seems like the problem.

Darn. I've added Gerd's patch since it is needed to fix the acceptance
tests in the Gitlab-CI. Could we maybe revert the patch that introduced
the regression instead, as long as no other proper fix is available? The
failing CI is really bugging me.

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]