qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] spapr: move h_home_node_associativity to spapr_numa.c


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] spapr: move h_home_node_associativity to spapr_numa.c
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:25:43 +1000

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 07:06:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The implementation of this hypercall will be modified to use
> spapr->numa_assoc_arrays input. Moving it to spapr_numa.c makes
> make more sense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c        | 37 +------------------------------------
>  hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c         | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> index c1d01228c6..9e9b959bbd 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include "kvm_ppc.h"
>  #include "hw/ppc/fdt.h"
>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h"
>  #include "mmu-book3s-v3.h"
>  #include "hw/mem/memory-device.h"
>  
> @@ -1873,42 +1874,6 @@ static target_ulong 
> h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>      return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static target_ulong h_home_node_associativity(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> -                                              SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> -                                              target_ulong opcode,
> -                                              target_ulong *args)
> -{
> -    target_ulong flags = args[0];
> -    target_ulong procno = args[1];
> -    PowerPCCPU *tcpu;
> -    int idx;
> -
> -    /* only support procno from H_REGISTER_VPA */
> -    if (flags != 0x1) {
> -        return H_FUNCTION;
> -    }
> -
> -    tcpu = spapr_find_cpu(procno);
> -    if (tcpu == NULL) {
> -        return H_P2;
> -    }
> -
> -    /* sequence is the same as in the "ibm,associativity" property */
> -
> -    idx = 0;
> -#define ASSOCIATIVITY(a, b) (((uint64_t)(a) << 32) | \
> -                             ((uint64_t)(b) & 0xffffffff))
> -    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(0, 0);
> -    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(0, tcpu->node_id);
> -    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(procno, -1);
> -    for ( ; idx < 6; idx++) {
> -        args[idx] = -1;
> -    }
> -#undef ASSOCIATIVITY
> -
> -    return H_SUCCESS;
> -}
> -
>  static target_ulong h_get_cpu_characteristics(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>                                                SpaprMachineState *spapr,
>                                                target_ulong opcode,
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> index 93a000b729..d4dca57321 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> @@ -165,3 +165,39 @@ void spapr_numa_write_rtas_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, 
> void *fdt, int rtas)
>      _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, rtas, "ibm,max-associativity-domains",
>                       maxdomains, sizeof(maxdomains)));
>  }
> +
> +target_ulong h_home_node_associativity(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                       SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> +                                       target_ulong opcode,
> +                                       target_ulong *args)

So, if you're moving this function to this file, you should also move
the corresponding spapr_register_hypercall() to this file.  That will
let you keep this function static.

> +{
> +    target_ulong flags = args[0];
> +    target_ulong procno = args[1];
> +    PowerPCCPU *tcpu;
> +    int idx;
> +
> +    /* only support procno from H_REGISTER_VPA */
> +    if (flags != 0x1) {
> +        return H_FUNCTION;
> +    }
> +
> +    tcpu = spapr_find_cpu(procno);
> +    if (tcpu == NULL) {
> +        return H_P2;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* sequence is the same as in the "ibm,associativity" property */
> +
> +    idx = 0;
> +#define ASSOCIATIVITY(a, b) (((uint64_t)(a) << 32) | \
> +                             ((uint64_t)(b) & 0xffffffff))
> +    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(0, 0);
> +    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(0, tcpu->node_id);
> +    args[idx++] = ASSOCIATIVITY(procno, -1);
> +    for ( ; idx < 6; idx++) {
> +        args[idx] = -1;
> +    }
> +#undef ASSOCIATIVITY
> +
> +    return H_SUCCESS;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
> index b3fd950634..5b4d165c06 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
> @@ -31,5 +31,9 @@ int spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void 
> *fdt,
>                              int offset, PowerPCCPU *cpu);
>  int spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
>                                           int offset);
> +target_ulong h_home_node_associativity(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                       SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> +                                       target_ulong opcode,
> +                                       target_ulong *args);
>  
>  #endif /* HW_SPAPR_NUMA_H */

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]