qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] target/i386/cpu: add return value verification and ignore Error


From: Pan Nengyuan
Subject: [PATCH] target/i386/cpu: add return value verification and ignore Error objects
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 09:45:29 -0400

'err' is unnecessary in x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features(), we can change 
x86_cpu_expand_features()
to return true on success, false on failure, then pass NULL here to remove it.

Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
 target/i386/cpu.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index 49d8958528..c3d3766133 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -4883,7 +4883,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_parse_featurestr(const char 
*typename, char *features,
     }
 }
 
-static void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp);
+static bool x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp);
 static void x86_cpu_filter_features(X86CPU *cpu, bool verbose);
 
 /* Build a list with the name of all features on a feature word array */
@@ -4925,7 +4925,6 @@ static void 
x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features(X86CPUClass *xcc,
                                                  strList **missing_feats)
 {
     X86CPU *xc;
-    Error *err = NULL;
     strList **next = missing_feats;
 
     if (xcc->host_cpuid_required && !accel_uses_host_cpuid()) {
@@ -4937,8 +4936,7 @@ static void 
x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features(X86CPUClass *xcc,
 
     xc = X86_CPU(object_new_with_class(OBJECT_CLASS(xcc)));
 
-    x86_cpu_expand_features(xc, &err);
-    if (err) {
+    if (!x86_cpu_expand_features(xc, NULL)) {
         /* Errors at x86_cpu_expand_features should never happen,
          * but in case it does, just report the model as not
          * runnable at all using the "type" property.
@@ -4947,7 +4945,6 @@ static void 
x86_cpu_class_check_missing_features(X86CPUClass *xcc,
         new->value = g_strdup("type");
         *next = new;
         next = &new->next;
-        error_free(err);
     }
 
     x86_cpu_filter_features(xc, false);
@@ -6426,7 +6423,7 @@ static void x86_cpu_enable_xsave_components(X86CPU *cpu)
 /* Expand CPU configuration data, based on configured features
  * and host/accelerator capabilities when appropriate.
  */
-static void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
+static bool x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
 {
     CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
     FeatureWord w;
@@ -6436,14 +6433,14 @@ static void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error 
**errp)
     for (l = plus_features; l; l = l->next) {
         const char *prop = l->data;
         if (!object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), prop, true, errp)) {
-            return;
+            return false;
         }
     }
 
     for (l = minus_features; l; l = l->next) {
         const char *prop = l->data;
         if (!object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), prop, false, errp)) {
-            return;
+            return false;
         }
     }
 
@@ -6540,6 +6537,8 @@ static void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error 
**errp)
     if (env->cpuid_xlevel2 == UINT32_MAX) {
         env->cpuid_xlevel2 = env->cpuid_min_xlevel2;
     }
+
+    return true;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.18.2




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]