qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 08/10] pc-bios: refresh edk2 build artifacts for edk2-stable2


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] pc-bios: refresh edk2 build artifacts for edk2-stable202008
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:32:28 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

+GitLab team & Gerd (for building firmwares)

On 9/8/20 9:29 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Rebuild the pc-bios/edk2-*.fd.bz2 binaries, based on the edk2-stable202008
> release.
> 
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1852196
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
>  pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd.bz2       | Bin 1178070 -> 1507722 bytes
>  pc-bios/edk2-arm-code.fd.bz2           | Bin 1172752 -> 1503187 bytes
>  pc-bios/edk2-i386-code.fd.bz2          | Bin 1736199 -> 1646741 bytes
>  pc-bios/edk2-i386-secure-code.fd.bz2   | Bin 1943949 -> 1860546 bytes
>  pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-code.fd.bz2        | Bin 1717094 -> 1680164 bytes
>  pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd.bz2 | Bin 1958037 -> 1912112 bytes
>  6 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd.bz2 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd.bz2
> index a074085b224f..5bf311464a79 100644
> Binary files a/pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd.bz2 and 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-aarch64-code.fd.bz2 differ
> diff --git a/pc-bios/edk2-arm-code.fd.bz2 b/pc-bios/edk2-arm-code.fd.bz2
> index 42453cd1f273..7a98069814dc 100644
> Binary files a/pc-bios/edk2-arm-code.fd.bz2 and 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-arm-code.fd.bz2 differ
> diff --git a/pc-bios/edk2-i386-code.fd.bz2 b/pc-bios/edk2-i386-code.fd.bz2
> index 633759688e32..e7b1befe2cfe 100644
> Binary files a/pc-bios/edk2-i386-code.fd.bz2 and 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-i386-code.fd.bz2 differ
> diff --git a/pc-bios/edk2-i386-secure-code.fd.bz2 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-i386-secure-code.fd.bz2
> index df27bdd2ddbd..b5df5bed3086 100644
> Binary files a/pc-bios/edk2-i386-secure-code.fd.bz2 and 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-i386-secure-code.fd.bz2 differ
> diff --git a/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-code.fd.bz2 b/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-code.fd.bz2
> index 0e108fc68a91..e1654d4003b7 100644
> Binary files a/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-code.fd.bz2 and 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-code.fd.bz2 differ
> diff --git a/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd.bz2 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd.bz2
> index 522f8376aabe..767274c38c7f 100644
> Binary files a/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd.bz2 and 
> b/pc-bios/edk2-x86_64-secure-code.fd.bz2 differ
> 

Now I remember why I kept that patch on hold.

The CI idea is to have reproducible builds if possible.
When the submodule is updated (or the QEMU scripts containing the
-D defines), it triggers the 'build-edk2' job which produce these
same binaries.
My original idea was to push the tag on GitLab that triggers the
job, then download the produced binaries, test them, then commit
them.

With your series, I get these binaries:
https://gitlab.com/philmd/qemu/-/jobs/731618363/artifacts/browse/pc-bios/

However they differ with yours, for example:

0000 6100: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 2F 68 6F 6D  ........
..../hom
0000 6110: 65 2F 6C 61 63 6F 73 2F  73 72 63 2F 75 70 73 74  e/lacos/
src/upst
0000 6120: 72 65 61 6D 2F 71 65 6D  75 2F 72 6F 6D 73 2F 65  ream/qem
u/roms/e
0000 6130: 64 6B 32 2F 42 75 69 6C  64 2F 41 72 6D 56 69 72  dk2/Buil
d/ArmVir
0000 6140: 74 51 65 6D 75 2D 41 41  52 43 48 36 34 2F 44 45  tQemu-AA
RCH64/DE
0000 6150: 42 55 47 5F 47 43 43 35  2F 41 41 52 43 48 36 34  BUG_GCC5
/AARCH64
0000 6160: 2F 41 72 6D 50 6C 61 74  66 6F 72 6D 50 6B 67 2F  /ArmPlat
formPkg/
0000 6170: 50 72 65 50 65 69 43 6F  72 65 2F 50 72 65 50 65  PrePeiCo
re/PrePe
0000 6180: 69 43 6F 72 65 55 6E 69  43 6F 72 65 2F 44 45 42  iCoreUni
Core/DEB
0000 6190: 55 47 2F 41 72 6D 50 6C  61 74 66 6F 72 6D 50 72  UG/ArmPl
atformPr
0000 61A0: 65 50 65 69 43 6F 72 65  2E 64 6C 6C 00 00 00 00  ePeiCore
.dll....

0000 6100: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 2F 62 75 69  ........
..../bui
0000 6110: 6C 64 73 2F 70 68 69 6C  6D 64 2F 71 65 6D 75 2F  lds/phil
md/qemu/
0000 6120: 72 6F 6D 73 2F 65 64 6B  32 2F 42 75 69 6C 64 2F  roms/edk
2/Build/
0000 6130: 41 72 6D 56 69 72 74 51  65 6D 75 2D 41 41 52 43  ArmVirtQ
emu-AARC
0000 6140: 48 36 34 2F 44 45 42 55  47 5F 47 43 43 35 2F 41  H64/DEBU
G_GCC5/A
0000 6150: 41 52 43 48 36 34 2F 41  72 6D 50 6C 61 74 66 6F  ARCH64/A
rmPlatfo
0000 6160: 72 6D 50 6B 67 2F 50 72  65 50 65 69 43 6F 72 65  rmPkg/Pr
ePeiCore
0000 6170: 2F 50 72 65 50 65 69 43  6F 72 65 55 6E 69 43 6F  /PrePeiC
oreUniCo
0000 6180: 72 65 2F 44 45 42 55 47  2F 41 72 6D 50 6C 61 74  re/DEBUG
/ArmPlat
0000 6190: 66 6F 72 6D 50 72 65 50  65 69 43 6F 72 65 2E 64  formPreP
eiCore.d
0000 61A0: 6C 6C 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ll......
........

For now this is not a blocker, but we should consider switching to
this workflow at some point (caring about all the files that really
need to be archived, maybe debug symbols etc...).

w.r.t. your patch:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Regards,

Phil.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]