qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c: Fix wrong usage of gboolean types in P


From: Amey Narkhede
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c: Fix wrong usage of gboolean types in PVSCSIState
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:43:09 +0530

On 20/09/14 08:32AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Amey,
>
> On 9/14/20 1:44 AM, Amey Narkhede wrote:
> > rings_info_valid, msg_ring_info_valid and use_msg fields of struct
> > PVSCSIState are using gboolean TRUE/FALSE values with the type uint8_t.
> > Change their type to bool along with the usage of initialization macro
> > VMSTATE_BOOL during initialization of vmstate_pvscsi and
> > pvscsi_properties.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c b/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
> > index c071e0c7aa..86f00e3d7e 100644
> > --- a/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
> > +++ b/hw/scsi/vmw_pvscsi.c
> > @@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ typedef struct {
> >      /* Collector for current command data */
> >      uint32_t curr_cmd_data[PVSCSI_MAX_CMD_DATA_WORDS];
> >
> > -    uint8_t rings_info_valid;            /* Whether data rings initialized 
> >   */
> > -    uint8_t msg_ring_info_valid;         /* Whether message ring 
> > initialized */
> > -    uint8_t use_msg;                     /* Whether to use message ring    
> >   */
> > +    bool rings_info_valid;            /* Whether data rings initialized   
> > */
> > +    bool msg_ring_info_valid;         /* Whether message ring initialized 
> > */
> > +    bool use_msg;                     /* Whether to use message ring      
> > */
> >
> >      uint8_t msi_used;                    /* For migration compatibility    
> >   */
> >      PVSCSIRingInfo rings;                /* Data transfer rings manager    
> >   */
> > @@ -349,8 +349,8 @@ pvscsi_reset_state(PVSCSIState *s)
> >      s->reg_command_status = PVSCSI_COMMAND_PROCESSING_SUCCEEDED;
> >      s->reg_interrupt_status = 0;
> >      pvscsi_ring_cleanup(&s->rings);
> > -    s->rings_info_valid = FALSE;
> > -    s->msg_ring_info_valid = FALSE;
> > +    s->rings_info_valid = false;
> > +    s->msg_ring_info_valid = false;
> >      QTAILQ_INIT(&s->pending_queue);
> >      QTAILQ_INIT(&s->completion_queue);
> >  }
> > @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ pvscsi_on_cmd_setup_rings(PVSCSIState *s)
> >      pvscsi_dbg_dump_tx_rings_config(rc);
> >      pvscsi_ring_init_data(&s->rings, rc);
> >
> > -    s->rings_info_valid = TRUE;
> > +    s->rings_info_valid = true;
> >      return PVSCSI_COMMAND_PROCESSING_SUCCEEDED;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ pvscsi_on_cmd_setup_msg_ring(PVSCSIState *s)
> >          if (pvscsi_ring_init_msg(&s->rings, rc) < 0) {
> >              return PVSCSI_COMMAND_PROCESSING_FAILED;
> >          }
> > -        s->msg_ring_info_valid = TRUE;
> > +        s->msg_ring_info_valid = true;
> >      }
> >      return sizeof(PVSCSICmdDescSetupMsgRing) / sizeof(uint32_t);
> >  }
> > @@ -1232,9 +1232,9 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pvscsi = {
> >          VMSTATE_UINT32(curr_cmd_data_cntr, PVSCSIState),
> >          VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(curr_cmd_data, PVSCSIState,
> >                               ARRAY_SIZE(((PVSCSIState 
> > *)NULL)->curr_cmd_data)),
> > -        VMSTATE_UINT8(rings_info_valid, PVSCSIState),
> > -        VMSTATE_UINT8(msg_ring_info_valid, PVSCSIState),
> > -        VMSTATE_UINT8(use_msg, PVSCSIState),
> > +        VMSTATE_BOOL(rings_info_valid, PVSCSIState),
> > +        VMSTATE_BOOL(msg_ring_info_valid, PVSCSIState),
> > +        VMSTATE_BOOL(use_msg, PVSCSIState),
>
> I believe this change the migration data structure. This
> area is described in "Changing migration data structures"
> in docs/devel/migration.rst.
>
> If this structure were not affected, your change would be
> a good cleanup. However changing migration can become a
> nightmare, so ... cleaning this is hard.
>
> Cc'ing Dave (a migration maintainer) as I'm not sure there
> already is a document describing easily this problem.
>
So should I drop those migration related changes?
> >
> >          VMSTATE_UINT64(rings.rs_pa, PVSCSIState),
> >          VMSTATE_UINT32(rings.txr_len_mask, PVSCSIState),
> > @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pvscsi = {
> >  };
> >
> >  static Property pvscsi_properties[] = {
> > -    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("use_msg", PVSCSIState, use_msg, 1),
> > +    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("use_msg", PVSCSIState, use_msg, true),
> >      DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-old-pci-configuration", PVSCSIState, compat_flags,
> >                      PVSCSI_COMPAT_OLD_PCI_CONFIGURATION_BIT, false),
> >      DEFINE_PROP_BIT("x-disable-pcie", PVSCSIState, compat_flags,
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
> > This is my first qemu patch. Let know if there are any mistakes
> >
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]