[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] target/arm/kvm64: make MPIDR consistent with CPU T
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] target/arm/kvm64: make MPIDR consistent with CPU Topology |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:53:30 +0200 |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:20:23AM +0800, Ying Fang wrote:
> MPIDR helps to provide an additional PE identification in a multiprocessor
> system. This patch adds support for setting MPIDR from userspace, so that
> MPIDR is consistent with CPU topology configured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Fang <fangying1@huawei.com>
> ---
> target/arm/kvm64.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> index ef1e960285..fcce261a10 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> @@ -757,10 +757,46 @@ static int kvm_arm_sve_set_vls(CPUState *cs)
>
> #define ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR 3, 0, 0, 0, 5
>
> +static int kvm_arm_set_mp_affinity(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> + uint64_t mpidr;
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
> +
> + if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MP_AFFINITY)) {
> + /* Make MPIDR consistent with CPU topology */
> + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> +
> + mpidr = (kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cs) % ms->smp.threads) << ARM_AFF0_SHIFT;
We should query KVM first to determine if it wants guests to see their PEs
as threads or not. If not, and ms->smp.threads is > 1, then that's an
error. And, in any case, if ms->smp.threads == 1, then we shouldn't waste
aff0 on it, as that could reduce IPI broadcast performance.
> + mpidr |= ((kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cs) / ms->smp.threads % ms->smp.cores)
> + & 0xff) << ARM_AFF1_SHIFT;
> + mpidr |= (kvm_arch_vcpu_id(cs) / (ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.threads)
> + & 0xff) << ARM_AFF2_SHIFT;
> +
> + /* Override mp affinity when KVM is in use */
> + cpu->mp_affinity = mpidr & ARM64_AFFINITY_MASK;
> +
> + /* Bit 31 is RES1 indicates the ARMv7 Multiprocessing Extensions */
> + mpidr |= (1ULL << 31);
> + return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_ARM_SET_MP_AFFINITY, &mpidr);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * When KVM_CAP_ARM_MP_AFFINITY is not supported, it means KVM has
> its
> + * own idea about MPIDR assignment, so we override our defaults with
> + * what we get from KVM.
> + */
> + int ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, ARM64_SYS_REG(ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR),
> &mpidr);
> + if (ret) {
> + error_report("failed to set MPIDR");
We don't need this error, kvm_get_one_reg() has trace support already.
Anyway, the wording is wrong since it says 'set' instead of 'get'.
> + return ret;
> + }
> + cpu->mp_affinity = mpidr & ARM32_AFFINITY_MASK;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +}
> +
> int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> {
> int ret;
> - uint64_t mpidr;
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
> CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
>
> @@ -814,16 +850,10 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> }
> }
>
> - /*
> - * When KVM is in use, PSCI is emulated in-kernel and not by qemu.
> - * Currently KVM has its own idea about MPIDR assignment, so we
> - * override our defaults with what we get from KVM.
> - */
> - ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, ARM64_SYS_REG(ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR), &mpidr);
> + ret = kvm_arm_set_mp_affinity(cs);
> if (ret) {
> return ret;
> }
> - cpu->mp_affinity = mpidr & ARM64_AFFINITY_MASK;
>
> kvm_arm_init_debug(cs);
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>
>
Thanks,
drew