qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 00/24] qtests, unit tests and Cirrus-CI fixes / improvements


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PULL 00/24] qtests, unit tests and Cirrus-CI fixes / improvements
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:40:32 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 17/09/2020 18.33, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:29 PM Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com
> <mailto:thuth@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/09/2020 17.14, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 12:47, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com
> <mailto:thuth@redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> * Fix "readlink -f" problem in iotests on macOS (to fix the
> Cirrus-CI tests)
>> >> * Some minor qtest improvements
>> >> * Fix the unit tests to work on MSYS2, too
>> >> * Enable building and testing on MSYS2 in the Cirrus-CI
>> >> * Build FreeBSD with one task again in the Cirrus-CI
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > After merging this one I tried installing GNU sed on my local
>> > box so it could run the iotests, but they fail like this
>> > because they assume readarray, which doesn't exist in
>> > OSX bash
>> Ok, sounds like I should respin my patch here:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-09/msg04476.html
>>
>> ... and could you install a newer version of bash via homebrew on your
>> system?
> What's the reason to exclude these list on win32? That's didn't optimize
> the time much, and indeed they can be
> compiled.
> --target-list-exclude=i386-softmmu,arm-softmmu,ppc-softmmu,mips-softmmu"

The total run time of the job is already 50 minutes, so I was afraid
that it would hit the 1h time limit otherwise.
The targets that are excluded are just subsets of other targets, e.g.
i386-softmmu is a subset of x86_64-softmmu, so we don't lose much test
coverage by excluding them.

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]