[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Mark Icelake-Client CPU models deprecated
From: |
Eduardo Habkost |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Mark Icelake-Client CPU models deprecated |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 14:01:58 -0400 |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:37:14PM +0800, Robert Hoo wrote:
> Going to obsolete Icelake-Client CPU models in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Change log
> v3:
> Obsolete in v5.2 --> v5.3.
>
> target/i386/cpu.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 9cb82b7..15c1c00 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -3467,7 +3467,12 @@ static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[] = {
> .xlevel = 0x80000008,
> .model_id = "Intel Core Processor (Icelake)",
> .versions = (X86CPUVersionDefinition[]) {
> - { .version = 1 },
> + {
> + .version = 1,
> + .deprecated = true,
> + .note = "Deprecated. Will be obsoleted in v5.3. Please use "
> + "'Icelake-Server-v1' CPU model",
What's the difference between "deprecated" and "obsoleted"?
> + },
> {
> .version = 2,
> .note = "no TSX",
> @@ -3477,6 +3482,9 @@ static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[] = {
> { "rtm", "off" },
> { /* end of list */ }
> },
> + .deprecated = true,
> + .note = "Deprecated. Will be obsoleted in v5.3. Please use "
> + "'Icelake-Server-v2' CPU model",
> },
> { /* end of list */ }
> }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Eduardo
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Introduce (x86) CPU model deprecation API, Eduardo Habkost, 2020/09/17