[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 04/38] qapi: Prefer explicit relative imports
|
From: |
Cleber Rosa |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 04/38] qapi: Prefer explicit relative imports |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:25:50 -0400 |
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 01:12:09PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> On 9/23/20 9:18 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > Relative imports are a source of heated debates, but when properly
> > used in a self contained module like here, they are very posititive
> > IMO.
>
> Still? I know they were loathed pre-3.5, but in my subjective experience
> they behave the nicest overall in the modern python dialect.
>
> What are the downsides?
>
> --js
I'll just invite Beraldo to the discussion and let the fun begin :).
- Cleber.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/38] qapi: Remove wildcard includes, (continued)
[PATCH v2 08/38] qapi/common.py: Remove python compatibility workaround, John Snow, 2020/09/22
[PATCH v2 17/38] qapi/events.py: add type hint annotations, John Snow, 2020/09/22
[PATCH v2 18/38] qapi/events.py: Move comments into docstrings, John Snow, 2020/09/22