qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/aspeed: Map the UART5 device unconditionally


From: Andrew Jeffery
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/aspeed: Map the UART5 device unconditionally
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:59:30 +0930
User-agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-382-ge235179-fm-20200928.002-ge2351794


On Fri, 18 Sep 2020, at 02:33, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 9/17/20 6:57 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 9/16/20 7:51 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 9/15/20 7:23 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> ping?
> >>
> >> It's reviewed : 
> >>
> >>   
> >> 20200905212415.760452-1-f4bug@amsat.org/">http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/20200905212415.760452-1-f4bug@amsat.org/
> >>
> > 
> > Yes I know :) This is part of my routine to check if a
> > patch hasn't been confirmed to be queued 1 week after the
> > last review, to ping the maintainer (because some
> > automatically flush patches older than 1month in their
> > mailbox).
> 
> ooh. That's brutal.
> 
> >> I will send a PR when I have more patches.
> > 
> > Ah OK. I didn't know you would keep merging the Aspeed
> > patches. Since this was a single patch, I thought it would
> > go via the usual qemu-arm queue from Peter.
> 
> sure. It could also. Fine with me. I have only three for the
> moment. 
> 
> > No rush, I just wanted to be sure the patch was not lost.
> > Also, once a patch is queued, I understand it is the
> > maintainer responsibility to keep rebasing the patch
> > queued.
> 
> yes. I know. I have been taking care of Andrew's ADC patches 
> since 2017 ... cough cough :)

Agh!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]