qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4] introduce vfio-user protocol specification


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] introduce vfio-user protocol specification
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:24:08 +0100

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:21:54AM -0700, John G Johnson wrote:
> > On Sep 29, 2020, at 3:37 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:58:37AM +0000, Thanos Makatos wrote:
> >>> It should be accompanied by a test in tests/. PCI-level testing APIS for
> >>> BARs, configuration space, interrupts, etc are available in
> >>> tests/qtest/libqos/pci.h. The test case needs to include a vfio-user
> >>> device backend interact with QEMU's vfio-user-pci implementation.
> >> 
> >> We plan to use a libmuser-based backend for testing. This, I suppose, will
> >> make libmuser a dependency of QEMU (either as a submodule or as a library),
> >> which for now can be disabled in the default configuration. Is this 
> >> acceptable?
> > 
> > If there are no other dependencies and libmuser supports all host
> > operating systems that QEMU's -device vfio-user supports, then I think
> > it's a good idea to use libmuser for at least one in-tree test in QEMU.
> > 
> >>> Also please let us know who is working on what so additional people can
> >>> get involved in areas that need work!
> >> 
> >> Swapnil and I will be working on libmuser and the test in QEMU, John and
> >> the mp-qemu folks will be working on the patches for implementing
> >> --device vfio-user-pci.
> > 
> > Great!
> > 
> > John: Will mpqemu use libmuser to implement the remote PCI host
> > controller?
> > 
> 
> 
>       The vfio-user-pci plan is to use libmuser on the server side.

Okay. Using libmuser in tests seems like a good choice in that case.

We'll need to figure out the details of how to do it because the
traditional shared library dependency approach is not well-suited to
in-development code. It would involve shipping libmuser distro packages
so QEMU's build system can declare a library dependency (with details
provided in a pkg-config file).

Here are approaches that are better for in-development libraries:
1. Keep the libmuser code in qemu.git.
2. A copy of libmuser in qemu.git with changes being sent upstream
   (allows more flexibility in case QEMU-specific issues require
   experimentation).
3. Git submodules.

#1 if you're happy to use the QEMU development process for merging
libmuser code then it's easiest to officially host the code in qemu.git.
libmuser gets a subdirectory in the qemu.git tree and you (the
maintainers) send pull requests. A libmuser library build target
provides installable static and shared libraries so external
applications can link against libmuser too. The big advantage here is
that QEMU can instantly use the latest libmuser code changes.

#2 works best if the library is a small (just a few source files) with
no fancy build system requirements.

#3 is used in QEMU for several other components. Submodules are a pain
to sync (requires sending a qemu.git patch to move to a new commit ID),
so this isn't good for a dependency that moves quickly.

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]