[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end
|
From: |
Peter Maydell |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Dec 2020 15:30:30 +0000 |
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 15:28, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> About reproducer, Michael asked about CVE-2020-24352 (ati_vga OOB in
> ati_2d_blt) this morning. What happens to reproducers when a CVE is
> assigned, but the bug is marked as "out of the QEMU security boundary"?
Also, why are we assigning CVEs for bugs we don't consider security bugs?
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/12/01
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, P J P, 2020/12/01
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/12/01
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, Markus Armbruster, 2020/12/02
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, P J P, 2020/12/02
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/12/02
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/12/02
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, P J P, 2020/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, Wenxiang Qian, 2020/12/11
- Re: [PATCH] ide:atapi: check io_buffer_index in ide_atapi_cmd_reply_end, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/12/11