qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC v7 15/22] cpu: Move tlb_fill to tcg_ops


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [RFC v7 15/22] cpu: Move tlb_fill to tcg_ops
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 12:37:03 -0500

On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:14:07PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 11/30/20 3:35 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> > From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  accel/tcg/cputlb.c              |  6 +++---
> >  accel/tcg/user-exec.c           |  6 +++---
> >  include/hw/core/cpu.h           |  9 ---------
> >  include/hw/core/tcg-cpu-ops.h   | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  target/alpha/cpu.c              |  2 +-
> >  target/arm/cpu.c                |  2 +-
> >  target/avr/cpu.c                |  2 +-
> >  target/cris/cpu.c               |  2 +-
> >  target/hppa/cpu.c               |  2 +-
> >  target/i386/tcg-cpu.c           |  2 +-
> >  target/lm32/cpu.c               |  2 +-
> >  target/m68k/cpu.c               |  2 +-
> >  target/microblaze/cpu.c         |  2 +-
> >  target/mips/cpu.c               |  2 +-
> >  target/moxie/cpu.c              |  2 +-
> >  target/nios2/cpu.c              |  2 +-
> >  target/openrisc/cpu.c           |  2 +-
> >  target/ppc/translate_init.c.inc |  2 +-
> >  target/riscv/cpu.c              |  2 +-
> >  target/rx/cpu.c                 |  2 +-
> >  target/s390x/cpu.c              |  2 +-
> >  target/sh4/cpu.c                |  2 +-
> >  target/sparc/cpu.c              |  2 +-
> >  target/tilegx/cpu.c             |  2 +-
> >  target/tricore/cpu.c            |  2 +-
> >  target/unicore32/cpu.c          |  2 +-
> >  target/xtensa/cpu.c             |  2 +-
> >  27 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> With cc->tcg_ops.* guarded with #ifdef CONFIG_TCG:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Thanks!

Are the #ifdefs a hard condition for your Reviewed-by?

Even if we agree #ifdef CONFIG_TCG is the way to go, I don't
think this should block a series that's a step in the right
direction.  It can be done in a separate patch.

(Unless the lack of #ifdef introduces regressions, of course)

-- 
Eduardo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]