Re: [PATCH] target/arm: do not use cc->do_interrupt for KVM directly

[Peter Maydell]

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 20:56, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> These are fairly obscure, and it wouldn't surprise me if
> other target archs had picked a different separation of
> concerns between userspace and the kernel such that userspace
> didn't need to manually deliver an exception.

...looking at the target/i386 code, it looks like the
approach taken on that architecture is that userspace just
asks the kernel to take the exception using the KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
ioctl. (For Arm we only use that ioctl to handle SError,
because the information that an SError is pending is a piece
of state that's external to the CPU.)

thanks
-- PMM