qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] target/mips: Don't use clock_get_ns() in clock period ca


From: Luc Michel
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] target/mips: Don't use clock_get_ns() in clock period calculation
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 09:50:14 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3

On 12/8/20 7:15 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
Currently the MIPS code uses the old clock_get_ns() API to
calculate a time length in nanoseconds:
  cpu->cp0_count_rate * clock_get_ns(MIPS_CPU(cpu)->clock)

This relies on the clock having a period which is an exact number
of nanoseconds.

Switch to the new clock_ticks_to_ns() function, which does the
multiplication internally at a higher precision.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc@lmichel.fr>

---
  target/mips/cpu.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/mips/cpu.c b/target/mips/cpu.c
index 76d50b00b42..de15ec6068a 100644
--- a/target/mips/cpu.c
+++ b/target/mips/cpu.c
@@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ static void mips_cp0_period_set(MIPSCPU *cpu)
  {
      CPUMIPSState *env = &cpu->env;
- env->cp0_count_ns = cpu->cp0_count_rate
-                        * clock_get_ns(MIPS_CPU(cpu)->clock);
+    env->cp0_count_ns = clock_ticks_to_ns(MIPS_CPU(cpu)->clock,
+                                          cpu->cp0_count_rate);
      assert(env->cp0_count_ns);
  }



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]