qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] block: add bdrv_co_delete_file_noerr


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] block: add bdrv_co_delete_file_noerr
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:54:53 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1

09.12.2020 23:33, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
This function wraps bdrv_co_delete_file for the common case of removing a file,
which was just created by format driver, on an error condition.

It hides the -ENOTSUPP error, and reports all other errors otherwise.

I've looked at original commit added this logic, and didn't find exactly, why 
should we hide it..


Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
---
  block.c               | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/block/block.h |  1 +
  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index f1cedac362..5d35ba2fb8 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -704,6 +704,30 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_delete_file(BlockDriverState *bs, 
Error **errp)
      return ret;
  }
+void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_delete_file_noerr(BlockDriverState *bs)
+{
+    Error *local_err = NULL;
+    int ret;
+
+    if (!bs) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    ret = bdrv_co_delete_file(bs, &local_err);
+    /*
+     * ENOTSUP will happen if the block driver doesn't support
+     * the 'bdrv_co_delete_file' interface. This is a predictable
+     * scenario and shouldn't be reported back to the user.
+     */

It's not predictable for user: user doesn't know internal processes and 
interfaces.

The problem: we've left extra file on failure scenario and can't remove it. We 
want to warn the user that there is a wrong file left. Why not to warn, when 
the removement is unsupported internally by the driver?

I think, it's better to report it in any case.

Another reason: less code and logic on failure case. Optimizing failure 
scenarios in different manner is seldom a good thing to do.

And finally: why to report the error at all? If we have errp parameter, it's better to 
add the info to it using error_append.. something like error_append(errp, " (also 
failed to remove unfinished file %s: %s)", file_name, error_get_pretty(local_err))


Probably I'm making mountains out of molehills. It should work, so take my r-b 
anyway:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>


Side note: I'd not split patches 02 and 03: this way it would be simpler to see 
the code movement.

+    if (ret == -ENOTSUP) {
+        error_free(local_err);
+    } else if (ret < 0) {
+        error_report_err(local_err);
+    }
+}
+
+
+

three empty lines..

  /**
   * Try to get @bs's logical and physical block size.
   * On success, store them in @bsz struct and return 0.
diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h
index c9d7c58765..af03022723 100644
--- a/include/block/block.h
+++ b/include/block/block.h
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
BlockDriverState *base,
                                Error **errp);
  void bdrv_unfreeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState 
*base);
  int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_delete_file(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp);
+void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_delete_file_noerr(BlockDriverState *bs);
typedef struct BdrvCheckResult {



--
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]