[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] icount: improve exec nocache usage
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] icount: improve exec nocache usage |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:41:38 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 12/8/20 3:10 AM, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> cpu-exec tries to execute TB without caching when current
> icount budget is over. But sometimes refilled budget is big
> enough to try executing cached blocks.
> This patch checks that instruction budget is big enough
> for next block execution instead of just running cpu_exec_nocache.
> It halves the number of calls of cpu_exec_nocache function
> during tested OS boot scenario.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>
> ---
> accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
> index 58aea605d8..251b340fb9 100644
> --- a/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
> +++ b/accel/tcg/cpu-exec.c
> @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ static inline void cpu_loop_exec_tb(CPUState *cpu,
> TranslationBlock *tb,
> insns_left = MIN(0xffff, cpu->icount_budget);
> cpu_neg(cpu)->icount_decr.u16.low = insns_left;
> cpu->icount_extra = cpu->icount_budget - insns_left;
> - if (!cpu->icount_extra) {
> + if (!cpu->icount_extra && insns_left < tb->icount) {
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
I also wonder if we should really be not caching these. Ever since MTTCG, we
have not actually been reusing the memory. We're simply removing the TB from
the hash table. I think we should be remembering these just in case we can in
fact reuse them.
r~