Re: [PATCH 0/2] bsd-user, FreeBSD update

[David CARLIER]

Oh good to know I understand better why syscalls not updated for so long.

To upstream I would suggest not to push straight all these changes in
one shot and focus on FreeBSD at first, much less to review and so on.

Regards.

On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 16:21, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 1:15 AM David CARLIER <devnexen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From 10b13162949debdbbd8394bc1047511d1a900176 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 08:10:43 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***
>>
>> bsd-user, FreeBSD update.
>>
>> David Carlier (2):
>>   bsd-user, updating the FreeBSD's syscall list, based on the 11.x
>>   bsd-user, Adding more strace support for a handful of syscalls.
>>
>>  bsd-user/freebsd/strace.list  | 12 ++++++++++++
>>  bsd-user/freebsd/syscall_nr.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> Have you seen my patches in this area? Are you familiar with the bsd-user 
> efforts we've been doing at https://github.com/qemu-bsd-user/qemu-bsd-user We 
> have about 300 patches in the queue and the more that others change things, 
> the harder it is to get them in. They are a twisty maze of conflicts early in 
> the series and some not-updated API calls dealing with the evolution of the 
> qemu cpu model as well.
>
> I posted this series two weeks ago: 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-12/msg05528.html
>
> This part https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-12/msg05530.html 
> updates the system call numbers to the latest FreeBSD 13 numbers.
>
> Perhaps you could help in these efforts? They have been going on since around 
> Qemu 1.0 and we were bad about getting them upstreamed early, and so are 
> paying the price now. We use the code in the above repo to build about 40k 
> packages for a couple of different architectures.
>
> Warner
>
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.0.rc2
>>