|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [RFC v11 28/55] target/arm: refactor exception and cpu code |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:43:18 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 |
On 3/25/21 5:59 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
Isn't tcg/tcg-* redundant?I considered that, and at some point I had "cpu.c" for x86 too. After working on it for a while, I noticed how it got really confusing in practice to have files called just "cpu.c" when working on them, just too many files are called "cpu.c". It was confusing. I also like the extra emphasis on the accel for this: kvm/kvm.c kvm/kvm-cpu.c kvm/kvm-stub.c tcg/tcg-cpu.c tcg/tcg-stub.c
But then you go and invent cpu-sve.c kvm/cpu-sve.c tcg/cpu-sve.c etc. So, please make up your mind. r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |