Re: [PATCH] qapi: Make some ObjectTypes depend on the build settings

[Thomas Huth]

On 29/09/2021 13.41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
> In my opinion, use of CONFIG_FOO in QAPI schemata is no worse than using
> them in C type definitions.
>
> In both cases, we have a choice: compile out stuff this build doesn't
> need with compile-time conditionals, or leave it in unused.
>
> In C, we sometimes have to compile out stuff, say when it depends on
> headers we don't have.
>
> In QAPI, we sometimes want to compile out stuff to make introspection
> more useful.  This can be a killer argument.

So what's your opinion on this patch here? Good to go? Needs a rework? Or 
should I simply forget about it?

 Thomas