qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 5/5] block/nvme: Fix memory leak from nvme_init_queue()


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] block/nvme: Fix memory leak from nvme_init_queue()
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 14:29:38 +0100

On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:49:31PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> nvme_create_queue_pair() allocates resources with qemu_vfio_dma_map(),
> but we never release them. Do it in nvme_free_queue() which is called
> from nvme_free_queue_pair().
> 
> Reported by valgrind:
> 
>   ==252858== 520,192 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 
> 8,293 of 8,302
>   ==252858==    at 0x4846803: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:1265)
>   ==252858==    by 0x484691F: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:1429)
>   ==252858==    by 0xB8AFE4: qemu_try_memalign (oslib-posix.c:210)
>   ==252858==    by 0xA9E315: nvme_create_queue_pair (nvme.c:229)
>   ==252858==    by 0xAA0125: nvme_init (nvme.c:799)
>   ==252858==    by 0xAA081C: nvme_file_open (nvme.c:953)
>   ==252858==    by 0xA23DDD: bdrv_open_driver (block.c:1550)
>   ==252858==    by 0xA24806: bdrv_open_common (block.c:1827)
>   ==252858==    by 0xA2889B: bdrv_open_inherit (block.c:3747)
>   ==252858==    by 0xA28DE4: bdrv_open (block.c:3840)
>   ==252858==    by 0x9E0F8E: bds_tree_init (blockdev.c:675)
>   ==252858==    by 0x9E7C74: qmp_blockdev_add (blockdev.c:3551)
> 
> Fixes: bdd6a90a9e5 ("block: Add VFIO based NVMe driver")
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/nvme.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
> index 6e476f54b9f..903c8ffa060 100644
> --- a/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/block/nvme.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static bool nvme_init_queue(BDRVNVMeState *s, NVMeQueue 
> *q,
>  
>  static void nvme_free_queue(BDRVNVMeState *s, NVMeQueue *q)
>  {
> +    qemu_vfio_dma_unmap(s->vfio, q->queue);
>      qemu_vfree(q->queue);
>  }

I can't figure out the issue. qemu_vfree(q->queue) was already called
before this patch. How does adding qemu_vfio_dma_unmap() help with the
valgrind report in the commit description?

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]