qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] numa: Set default distance map if needed


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] numa: Set default distance map if needed
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:18:18 +0200

On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 21:31:55 +1100
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Igor,
> 
> On 10/12/21 8:40 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed,  6 Oct 2021 18:22:08 +0800
> > Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> The following option is used to specify the distance map. It's
> >> possible the option isn't provided by user. In this case, the
> >> distance map isn't populated and exposed to platform. On the
> >> other hand, the empty NUMA node, where no memory resides, is
> >> allowed on ARM64 virt platform. For these empty NUMA nodes,
> >> their corresponding device-tree nodes aren't populated, but
> >> their NUMA IDs should be included in the "/distance-map"
> >> device-tree node, so that kernel can probe them properly if
> >> device-tree is used.
> >>
> >>    -numa,dist,src=<numa_id>,dst=<numa_id>,val=<distance>
> >>
> >> So when user doesn't specify distance map, we need to generate
> >> the default distance map, where the local and remote distances
> >> are 10 and 20 separately. This adds an extra parameter to the
> >> exiting complete_init_numa_distance() to generate the default
> >> distance map for this case.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>  
> > 
> > 
> > how about error-ing out if distance map is required but
> > not provided by user explicitly and asking user to fix
> > command line?
> > 
> > Reasoning behind this that defaults are hard to maintain
> > and will require compat hacks and being raod blocks down
> > the road.
> > Approach I was taking with generic NUMA code, is deprecating
> > defaults and replacing them with sanity checks, which bail
> > out on incorrect configuration and ask user to correct command line.
> > Hence I dislike approach taken in this patch.
> > 
> > If you really wish to provide default, push it out of
> > generic code into ARM specific one
> > (then I won't oppose it that much (I think PPC does
> > some magic like this))
> > Also behavior seems to be ARM specific so generic
> > NUMA code isn't a place for it anyways
> >   
> 
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> Yep, Lets move the logic into hw/arm/virt in v3 because I think simply
> error-ing out will block the existing configuration where the distance
> map isn't provided by user.

that can be solved by deprecating broken config (with temporary compat
code to keep the behavior for old machine types
and then all that be removed in 2 releases, leaving us with explicit
option only)

> After moving the logic to hw/arm/virt,
> this patch is consistent with PATCH[02/02] and the specific platform
> is affected only.
> 
> 
> >> ---
> >>   hw/core/numa.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> >>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
> >> index 510d096a88..fdb3a4aeca 100644
> >> --- a/hw/core/numa.c
> >> +++ b/hw/core/numa.c
> >> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static void validate_numa_distance(MachineState *ms)
> >>       }
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> -static void complete_init_numa_distance(MachineState *ms)
> >> +static void complete_init_numa_distance(MachineState *ms, bool is_default)
> >>   {
> >>       int src, dst;
> >>       NodeInfo *numa_info = ms->numa_state->nodes;
> >> @@ -609,6 +609,8 @@ static void complete_init_numa_distance(MachineState 
> >> *ms)
> >>               if (numa_info[src].distance[dst] == 0) {
> >>                   if (src == dst) {
> >>                       numa_info[src].distance[dst] = NUMA_DISTANCE_MIN;
> >> +                } else if (is_default) {
> >> +                    numa_info[src].distance[dst] = NUMA_DISTANCE_DEFAULT;
> >>                   } else {
> >>                       numa_info[src].distance[dst] = 
> >> numa_info[dst].distance[src];
> >>                   }
> >> @@ -716,13 +718,20 @@ void numa_complete_configuration(MachineState *ms)
> >>            * A->B != distance B->A, then that means the distance table is
> >>            * asymmetric. In this case, the distances for both directions
> >>            * of all node pairs are required.
> >> +         *
> >> +         * The default node pair distances, which are 10 and 20 for the
> >> +         * local and remote nodes separatly, are provided if user doesn't
> >> +         * specify any node pair distances.
> >>            */
> >>           if (ms->numa_state->have_numa_distance) {
> >>               /* Validate enough NUMA distance information was provided. */
> >>               validate_numa_distance(ms);
> >>   
> >>               /* Validation succeeded, now fill in any missing distances. 
> >> */
> >> -            complete_init_numa_distance(ms);
> >> +            complete_init_numa_distance(ms, false);
> >> +        } else {
> >> +            complete_init_numa_distance(ms, true);
> >> +            ms->numa_state->have_numa_distance = true;
> >>           }
> >>       }
> >>   }  
> >   
> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]