[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v5 66/67] target/hppa: Implement prctl_unalign_sigbus
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
[PATCH v5 66/67] target/hppa: Implement prctl_unalign_sigbus |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2021 21:10:52 -0700 |
Leave TARGET_ALIGNED_ONLY set, but use the new CPUState
flag to set MO_UNALN for the instructions that the kernel
handles in the unaligned trap.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
linux-user/hppa/target_prctl.h | 2 +-
target/hppa/cpu.h | 5 ++++-
target/hppa/translate.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/hppa/target_prctl.h b/linux-user/hppa/target_prctl.h
index eb53b31ad5..5629ddbf39 100644
--- a/linux-user/hppa/target_prctl.h
+++ b/linux-user/hppa/target_prctl.h
@@ -1 +1 @@
-/* No special prctl support required. */
+#include "../generic/target_prctl_unalign.h"
diff --git a/target/hppa/cpu.h b/target/hppa/cpu.h
index 294fd7297f..45fd338b02 100644
--- a/target/hppa/cpu.h
+++ b/target/hppa/cpu.h
@@ -259,12 +259,14 @@ static inline target_ulong hppa_form_gva(CPUHPPAState
*env, uint64_t spc,
return hppa_form_gva_psw(env->psw, spc, off);
}
-/* Since PSW_{I,CB} will never need to be in tb->flags, reuse them.
+/*
+ * Since PSW_{I,CB} will never need to be in tb->flags, reuse them.
* TB_FLAG_SR_SAME indicates that SR4 through SR7 all contain the
* same value.
*/
#define TB_FLAG_SR_SAME PSW_I
#define TB_FLAG_PRIV_SHIFT 8
+#define TB_FLAG_UNALIGN 0x400
static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUHPPAState *env, target_ulong *pc,
target_ulong *cs_base,
@@ -279,6 +281,7 @@ static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUHPPAState *env,
target_ulong *pc,
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
*pc = env->iaoq_f & -4;
*cs_base = env->iaoq_b & -4;
+ flags |= TB_FLAG_UNALIGN * !env_cpu(env)->prctl_unalign_sigbus;
#else
/* ??? E, T, H, L, B, P bits need to be here, when implemented. */
flags |= env->psw & (PSW_W | PSW_C | PSW_D);
diff --git a/target/hppa/translate.c b/target/hppa/translate.c
index c3698cf067..fdaa2b12b8 100644
--- a/target/hppa/translate.c
+++ b/target/hppa/translate.c
@@ -272,8 +272,18 @@ typedef struct DisasContext {
int mmu_idx;
int privilege;
bool psw_n_nonzero;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+ MemOp unalign;
+#endif
} DisasContext;
+#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+#define UNALIGN(C) (C)->unalign
+#else
+#define UNALIGN(C) 0
+#endif
+
/* Note that ssm/rsm instructions number PSW_W and PSW_E differently. */
static int expand_sm_imm(DisasContext *ctx, int val)
{
@@ -1477,7 +1487,7 @@ static void do_load_32(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv_i32 dest,
unsigned rb,
form_gva(ctx, &addr, &ofs, rb, rx, scale, disp, sp, modify,
ctx->mmu_idx == MMU_PHYS_IDX);
- tcg_gen_qemu_ld_reg(dest, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop);
+ tcg_gen_qemu_ld_reg(dest, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop | UNALIGN(ctx));
if (modify) {
save_gpr(ctx, rb, ofs);
}
@@ -1495,7 +1505,7 @@ static void do_load_64(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv_i64 dest,
unsigned rb,
form_gva(ctx, &addr, &ofs, rb, rx, scale, disp, sp, modify,
ctx->mmu_idx == MMU_PHYS_IDX);
- tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(dest, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop);
+ tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(dest, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop | UNALIGN(ctx));
if (modify) {
save_gpr(ctx, rb, ofs);
}
@@ -1513,7 +1523,7 @@ static void do_store_32(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv_i32 src,
unsigned rb,
form_gva(ctx, &addr, &ofs, rb, rx, scale, disp, sp, modify,
ctx->mmu_idx == MMU_PHYS_IDX);
- tcg_gen_qemu_st_i32(src, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop);
+ tcg_gen_qemu_st_i32(src, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop | UNALIGN(ctx));
if (modify) {
save_gpr(ctx, rb, ofs);
}
@@ -1531,7 +1541,7 @@ static void do_store_64(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv_i64 src,
unsigned rb,
form_gva(ctx, &addr, &ofs, rb, rx, scale, disp, sp, modify,
ctx->mmu_idx == MMU_PHYS_IDX);
- tcg_gen_qemu_st_i64(src, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop);
+ tcg_gen_qemu_st_i64(src, addr, ctx->mmu_idx, mop | UNALIGN(ctx));
if (modify) {
save_gpr(ctx, rb, ofs);
}
@@ -4110,6 +4120,7 @@ static void hppa_tr_init_disas_context(DisasContextBase
*dcbase, CPUState *cs)
ctx->mmu_idx = MMU_USER_IDX;
ctx->iaoq_f = ctx->base.pc_first | MMU_USER_IDX;
ctx->iaoq_b = ctx->base.tb->cs_base | MMU_USER_IDX;
+ ctx->unalign = (ctx->tb_flags & TB_FLAG_UNALIGN ? MO_UNALN : MO_ALIGN);
#else
ctx->privilege = (ctx->tb_flags >> TB_FLAG_PRIV_SHIFT) & 3;
ctx->mmu_idx = (ctx->tb_flags & PSW_D ? ctx->privilege : MMU_PHYS_IDX);
--
2.25.1
- Re: [PATCH v5 64/67] linux-user: Add code for PR_GET/SET_UNALIGN, (continued)
- [PATCH v5 67/67] target/sh4: Implement prctl_unalign_sigbus, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/15
- [PATCH v5 63/67] linux-user: Disable more prctl subcodes, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/15
- [PATCH v5 46/67] target/arm: Implement arm_cpu_record_sigbus, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/15
- [PATCH v5 56/67] target/sparc: Split out build_sfsr, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/15
- [PATCH v5 59/67] accel/tcg: Report unaligned load/store for user-only, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/15
- [PATCH v5 65/67] target/alpha: Implement prctl_unalign_sigbus, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/15
- [PATCH v5 62/67] linux-user: Split out do_prctl and subroutines, Richard Henderson, 2021/10/15
- [PATCH v5 66/67] target/hppa: Implement prctl_unalign_sigbus,
Richard Henderson <=