qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Postcopy migration: Add userfaultfd- user-mode-only capa


From: lma
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Postcopy migration: Add userfaultfd- user-mode-only capability
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:38:06 +0800
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail

在 2021-10-15 07:43,Peter Xu 写道:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 05:15:48PM +0800, Lin Ma wrote:
Since kernel v5.11, Unprivileged user (without SYS_CAP_PTRACE capability) must pass UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY to userfaultd in case unprivileged_userfaultfd
sysctl knob is 0.
Please refer to https://lwn.net/Articles/819834/ and the kernel commits:
37cd0575 userfaultfd: add UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY
d0d4730a userfaultfd: add user-mode only option to unprivileged_userfaultfd sysctl knob

This patch set adds a migration capability to pass UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY
for postcopy migration.

Then it's at least no KVM, no vhost, am I right? Could I ask is there a real
user behind this?  Thanks,

Well, The "user-mode-only" has nothing to do with qemu's user-mode emulation.

The unprivileged_userfaultfd sysctl knob controls whether unprivileged users can use the userfaultfd system calls. set it to 1 to allow unprivileged users to use the userfaultfd system calls. set it to 0 to restrict userfaultfd to only privileged users (with SYS_CAP_PTRACE capability).

If host's unprivileged_userfaultfd sysctl knob is 0(The default value of this knob is changed to 0 since host kernel v5.11): Qemu must pass the UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY flag when creating userfaultfd object for postcopy migration in case qemu runs as unprivileged user.

Before host kernel v5.11, If host's unprivileged_userfaultfd sysctl knob is 0, Then postcopy migration is not allowed in case qemu runs as unprivileged user.

Thanks,
Lin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]