Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] virtiofsd: Limit setxattr()'s creds-dropped region

[Hanna Reitz]

On 18.10.21 19:20, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40:35AM +0200, Hanna Reitz wrote:
> > We only need to drop/switch our credentials for the (f)setxattr() call
> > alone, not for the openat() or fchdir() around it.
> >
> > (Right now, this may not be that big of a problem, but with inodes being
> > identified by file handles instead of an O_PATH fd, we will need
> > open_by_handle_at() calls here, which is really fickle when it comes to
> > credentials being dropped.)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >   tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> > index 6511a6acb4..b43afdfbd3 100644
> > --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> > +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> > @@ -3123,6 +3123,7 @@ static void lo_setxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, 
> > const char *in_name,
> >       bool switched_creds = false;
> >       bool cap_fsetid_dropped = false;
> >       struct lo_cred old = {};
> > +    bool changed_cwd = false;
> >   
> >       if (block_xattr(lo, in_name)) {
> >           fuse_reply_err(req, EOPNOTSUPP);
> > @@ -3158,6 +3159,24 @@ static void lo_setxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, 
> > const char *in_name,
> >                ", name=%s value=%s size=%zd)\n", ino, name, value, size);
> >   
> >       sprintf(procname, "%i", inode->fd);
> > +    /*
> > +     * We can only open regular files or directories.  If the inode is
> > +     * something else, we have to enter /proc/self/fd and use
> > +     * setxattr() on the link's filename there.
> > +     */
> > +    if (S_ISREG(inode->filetype) || S_ISDIR(inode->filetype)) {
> > +        fd = openat(lo->proc_self_fd, procname, O_RDONLY);
> > +        if (fd < 0) {
> > +            saverr = errno;
> > +            goto out;
> > +        }
> > +    } else {
> > +        /* fchdir should not fail here */
> > +        FCHDIR_NOFAIL(lo->proc_self_fd);
> > +        /* Set flag so the clean-up path will chdir back */
> > +        changed_cwd = true;
> Is there a need to move FCHDIR_NOFAIL() call earlier too? I am assuming
> this will not be impacted by file handle stuff. So we probably could
> leave it in place. Easier to read.

I wanted to limit the region where the creds are dropped to an absolute 
minimum, i.e. just around (f)setxattr().  I prefer this in general, not 
just because it breaks opening file handles, and so I wanted to pull out 
not just the openat(), but the fchdir() as well.

Hanna