qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio/common: Add trace point when a MMIO RAM section


From: Kunkun Jiang
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio/common: Add trace point when a MMIO RAM section less than PAGE_SIZE
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 18:02:04 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1

Hi Eric,

On 2021/10/22 1:02, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Kunkun,

On 9/14/21 3:53 AM, Kunkun Jiang wrote:
The MSI-X structures of some devices and other non-MSI-X structures
are in the same BAR. They may share one host page, especially in the
may be in the same bar?
You are right. So embarrassing.😅
case of large page granularity, such as 64K.

For example, MSIX-Table size of 82599 NIC is 0x30 and the offset in
Bar 3(size 64KB) is 0x0. If host page size is 64KB.
remove the '.'
s/./, ?
In that case wouldn't the symptom be the same with a 4kB page?
Host page size is different, iova is different.
iova = REAL_HOST_PAGE_ALIGN(section->offset_within_address_space);

If host page size is 4KB, the iova will smaller than llend.
If host page size is 64KB, the iova will be equal to llend.

vfio_listener_region_add() will be called to map the remaining range
(0x30-0xffff). And it will return early at
'int128_ge((int128_make64(iova), llend))' and hasn't any message.
s/and hasn't any message /without any message

Ok, I will correct this in next version.

Let's add a trace point to informed users like commit 5c08600547c0
s/informed/inform
Same for this.
("vfio: Use a trace point when a RAM section cannot be DMA mapped")
did.

Signed-off-by: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>
---
  hw/vfio/common.c | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
index 8728d4d5c2..2fc6213c0f 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/common.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
@@ -892,6 +892,13 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener 
*listener,
      llend = int128_and(llend, int128_exts64(qemu_real_host_page_mask));
if (int128_ge(int128_make64(iova), llend)) {
+        if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) {
+            trace_vfio_listener_region_add_no_dma_map(
+                memory_region_name(section->mr),
+                section->offset_within_address_space,
+                int128_getlo(section->size),
+                qemu_real_host_page_size);
+        }
          return;
      }
      end = int128_get64(int128_sub(llend, int128_one()));
By the way, if this patch is accepted. The following code in the
vfio_listener_region_add may need to be deleted:
    if (memory_region_is_ram_device(section->mr)) {
        hwaddr pgmask = (1ULL << ctz64(hostwin->iova_pgsizes)) - 1;

        if ((iova & pgmask) || (int128_get64(llsize) & pgmask)) {
            trace_vfio_listener_region_add_no_dma_map(
                memory_region_name(section->mr),
                section->offset_within_address_space,
                int128_getlo(section->size),
                pgmask + 1);
            return;
        }
    }
What do you think?

Thanks,
Kunkun Jiang
Thanks

Eric

.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]