qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 02/12] vhost: Return number of free memslots


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/12] vhost: Return number of free memslots
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 17:45:11 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0

On 27.10.21 17:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 04:11:38PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 10/27/21 16:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 27.10.21 15:36, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> On 10/27/21 14:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> Let's return the number of free slots instead of only checking if there
>>>>> is a free slot. Required to support memory devices that consume multiple
>>>>> memslots.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  hw/mem/memory-device.c    | 2 +-
>>>>>  hw/virtio/vhost-stub.c    | 2 +-
>>>>>  hw/virtio/vhost.c         | 4 ++--
>>>>>  include/hw/virtio/vhost.h | 2 +-
>>>>>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>>>>> -bool vhost_has_free_slot(void)
>>>>> +unsigned int vhost_get_free_memslots(void)
>>>>>  {
>>>>>      return true;
>>>>
>>>>        return 0;
>>>
>>> Oh wait, no. This actually has to be
>>>
>>> "return ~0U;" (see real vhost_get_free_memslots())
>>>
>>> ... because there is no vhost and consequently no limit applies.
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> 
> confused. are you acking the theoretical patch with ~0 here?
> 

That's how I interpreted it.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]