qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] hw/intc/sh_intc: Use existing macro instead of loca


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] hw/intc/sh_intc: Use existing macro instead of local one
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:21:47 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 10/27/21 15:46, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
The INTC_A7 local macro does the same as the A7ADDR from
include/sh/sh.h so use the latter and drop the local macro definiion.

Typo "definition".

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
---
 hw/intc/sh_intc.c | 12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/sh_intc.c b/hw/intc/sh_intc.c
index c1058d97c0..0bd27aaf4f 100644
--- a/hw/intc/sh_intc.c
+++ b/hw/intc/sh_intc.c
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@
 #include "hw/sh4/sh.h"
 #include "trace.h"

-#define INTC_A7(x) ((x) & 0x1fffffff)
-
 void sh_intc_toggle_source(struct intc_source *source,
                            int enable_adj, int assert_adj)
 {
@@ -112,12 +110,12 @@ int sh_intc_get_pending_vector(struct intc_desc *desc, 
int imask)
 static unsigned int sh_intc_mode(unsigned long address,
                                  unsigned long set_reg, unsigned long clr_reg)
 {
-    if ((address != INTC_A7(set_reg)) &&
-        (address != INTC_A7(clr_reg)))
+    if ((address != A7ADDR(set_reg)) &&
+        (address != A7ADDR(clr_reg)))
         return INTC_MODE_NONE;

     if (set_reg && clr_reg) {
-        if (address == INTC_A7(set_reg)) {
+        if (address == A7ADDR(set_reg)) {
             return INTC_MODE_DUAL_SET;
         } else {
             return INTC_MODE_DUAL_CLR;
@@ -297,11 +295,11 @@ static unsigned int sh_intc_register(MemoryRegion *sysmem,

 #define SH_INTC_IOMEM_FORMAT "interrupt-controller-%s-%s-%s"
     snprintf(name, sizeof(name), SH_INTC_IOMEM_FORMAT, type, action, "p4");
-    memory_region_init_alias(iomem_p4, NULL, name, iomem, INTC_A7(address), 4);
+    memory_region_init_alias(iomem_p4, NULL, name, iomem, A7ADDR(address), 4);
     memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, P4ADDR(address), iomem_p4);

     snprintf(name, sizeof(name), SH_INTC_IOMEM_FORMAT, type, action, "a7");
-    memory_region_init_alias(iomem_a7, NULL, name, iomem, INTC_A7(address), 4);
+    memory_region_init_alias(iomem_a7, NULL, name, iomem, A7ADDR(address), 4);

I wonder why the address is masked out... It looks there is a mismatch
in the memory region mapping. Anyway this predates this cleanup, so:

This seems to be a peculiarity of the SH architecture. Like MIPS, it has some strange memory mapping conventions where same registers appear in different areas at predefined addresses. These macros just calculate that address.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]