[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v12 0/6] support dirtyrate at the granualrity of vcpu
From: |
Hyman Huang |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v12 0/6] support dirtyrate at the granualrity of vcpu |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:26:27 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 |
在 2021/10/27 14:31, Zheng Chuan 写道:
Hi.
I have no objection for the implement code itself.
But we should know or let the user know the performance penalty and conflicted
with migration compared to the hash method, especially for the performance of
vm with hugepages.
i dirty guest memory with 1G and do the measurement with two method.
the copy rate is almost 1,665 MB/s in vm
the following output is guest memory performance when do measurement
with dirty ring method:
/init (00001): INFO: 1635392998977ms copied 1 GB in 00616ms
/init (00001): INFO: 1635392999593ms copied 1 GB in 00615ms
/init (00001): INFO: 1635393000211ms copied 1 GB in 00616ms
----------------- start measurement -----------------------
/init (00001): INFO: 1635393000884ms copied 1 GB in 00672ms
/init (00001): INFO: 1635393001849ms copied 1 GB in 00963ms
/init (00001): INFO: 1635393002578ms copied 1 GB in 00727ms
----------------- end measurement -----------------------
/init (00001): INFO: 1635393003195ms copied 1 GB in 00615ms
/init (00001): INFO: 1635393003811ms copied 1 GB in 00614ms
/init (00001): INFO: 1635393004427ms copied 1 GB in 00615ms
guest memory performance do not trigger any changes almostly with hash
method:
the following is test results (measurment interval=1s):
method measurement result copy rate during measurement
hash 44 MB/s 1,665MB/s
dirty ring 1167 MB/s 1,523MB/s、1,063MB/s、1,408MB/s
the max penalty is 36% during test interval(1s), the average penalty is
20%。
if we trade off accurance, the dirty ring method may be a availiabe
method for user. users can select a appropriate method as they need.
On 2021/10/15 10:07, Hyman Huang wrote:
在 2021/10/15 9:32, Peter Xu 写道:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:01:17AM +0800, huangy81@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
From: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
v12
- adjust the order of calculating dirty rate
let memory_global_dirty_log_sync before calculating as
v11 version description.
Ping for Yong. >
Dave/Juan, any plan to review/merge this series (along with the other series of
dirty logging)?
I found it useful when I wanted to modify the program I used to generate
constant dirty workload - this series can help me to verify the change.
I still keep thinking this series is something good to have. Thanks,
the dirtyrate calculation has already been used to estimate time of live migration in
"e cloud" production of chinatelecom, it also predict the migration success
ratio, which provide valuable information for the cloud management plane when selecting
which vm should be migrated.
--
Best regard
Hyman Huang(黄勇)