[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64
From: |
Guo Ren |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64 |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:00:35 +0800 |
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:54 PM LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/1/25 16:40, Guo Ren wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:34 PM LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2022/1/25 14:45, Weiwei Li wrote:
> >>> From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> >>>
> >>> Highest bits of PTE has been used for svpbmt, ref: [1], [2], so we
> >>> need to ignore them. They cannot be a part of ppn.
> >>>
> >>> 1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged Architecture
> >>> 4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
> >>> 4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System
> >>>
> >>> 2:
> >>> https://github.com/riscv/virtual-memory/blob/main/specs/663-Svpbmt-diff.pdf
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> >>> Cc: Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
> >>> Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> target/riscv/cpu.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> >>> target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 7 +++++++
> >>> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> >>> index 55635d68d5..45de8faaca 100644
> >>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> >>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> >>> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ struct RISCVCPU {
> >>> bool ext_counters;
> >>> bool ext_ifencei;
> >>> bool ext_icsr;
> >>> + bool ext_svnapot;
> >>> + bool ext_svpbmt;
> >>> bool ext_zfh;
> >>> bool ext_zfhmin;
> >>> bool ext_zve32f;
> >>> @@ -495,6 +497,17 @@ static inline int riscv_cpu_xlen(CPURISCVState *env)
> >>> return 16 << env->xl;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >>> +#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
> >>> +#define riscv_cpu_sxl(env) ((void)(env), MXL_RV32)
> >>> +#else
> >>> +static inline RISCVMXL riscv_cpu_sxl(CPURISCVState *env)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS64_SXL);
> >>> +}
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >> Perhaps an interface also works for user mode is better.
> >>
> >> +#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
> >> +#define riscv_cpu_sxl(env) ((void)(env), MXL_RV32)
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline RISCVMXL riscv_cpu_sxl(CPURISCVState *env)
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >> + return env->misa_mxl;
> >> +#else
> >> + return get_field(env->mstatus, MSTATUS64_SXL);
> >> +#endif
> >> +}
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >>
> >>> /*
> >>> * Encode LMUL to lmul as follows:
> >>> * LMUL vlmul lmul
> >>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >>> index 7c87433645..37b622fbfa 100644
> >>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> >>> @@ -493,6 +493,13 @@ typedef enum {
> >>> /* Page table PPN shift amount */
> >>> #define PTE_PPN_SHIFT 10
> >>>
> >>> +/* Page table PPN mask */
> >>> +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> >>> +#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0xFFFFFC00UL
> >>> +#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> >>> +#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0x3FFFFFFFFFFC00ULL
> >>> +#endif
> >>> +
> >> No need to define PTE_PPN_MASK for TARGET_RISCV32.
> > ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >
> > pte is target_ulong, so types are different.
> >
> > TARGET_RISCV32: is 32bit.
> > TARGET_RISCV64: is 64bit.
> >
> I should make it more clear. You will not use PTE_PPN_MASK on
> TARGET_RISCV32.
> >>> /* Leaf page shift amount */
> >>> #define PGSHIFT 12
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >>> index 327a2c4f1d..2a921bedfd 100644
> >>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> >>> @@ -622,7 +622,19 @@ restart:
> >>> return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >>> + hwaddr ppn;
> >>> + RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (riscv_cpu_sxl(env) == MXL_RV32) {
> >>> + ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
>
> TARGET_RISCV32 will always come here. So no need to define PTE_PPN_MASK
> for TARGET_RISCV32.
Oops, maybe we should use TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 4
#if TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 4
typedef int32_t target_long;
typedef uint32_t target_ulong;
#define TARGET_FMT_lx "%08x"
#define TARGET_FMT_ld "%d"
#define TARGET_FMT_lu "%u"
#elif TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 8
typedef int64_t target_long;
typedef uint64_t target_ulong;
#define TARGET_FMT_lx "%016" PRIx64
#define TARGET_FMT_ld "%" PRId64
#define TARGET_FMT_lu "%" PRIu64
#else
#error TARGET_LONG_SIZE undefined
#endif
>
> Thanks,
> Zhiwei
>
> >>> + } else if (cpu->cfg.ext_svpbmt || cpu->cfg.ext_svnapot) {
> >>> + ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> >>> + if ((pte & ~PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT) {
> >>> + return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
> >>> /* Invalid PTE */
> >> Otherwise,
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Zhiwei
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
[PATCH v6 2/5] target/riscv: add PTE_A/PTE_D/PTE_U bits check for inner PTE, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/25
[PATCH v6 4/5] target/riscv: add support for svinval extension, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/25
[PATCH v6 5/5] target/riscv: add support for svpbmt extension, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/25
Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] support subsets of virtual memory extension, Guo Ren, 2022/01/25