Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] hmat acpi: Don't require initiator value in -numa

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:30:58 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > 
> > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit :  
> > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200
> > > Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may
> > > > build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes whose best initiators
> > > > are not just another single node.
> > > >   
> > > patches looks fine code-wise,
> > > however something wrong with them, i.e. 'git am' doesn't like them
> > > nor ./scripts/checkpatch (which one should use before sending patches).
> > > 
> > > I've checked it's not my mail server/client issue(or whatever)
> > > that corrupts them (ones downloaded from patchew are broken as well)  
> > 
> > 
> > I don't know what's going on. These 4 patches are in
> > https://github.com/bgoglin/qemu/commits/hmat-noinitiator (rebased on master
> > 10mn ago).  
> 
> It's the commit log that's corrupted.
> 
> > Do whatever you want with them. I am not allowed to spend more time on this.
> > 
> > Brice  
> 
> Maybe someone will fix up the log and repost. One can hope ..
> 

We are planning to send out arm/virt support shortly including a similar test
that uses this series.  So if no one else gets to it before hand we'll include
fixed up version of Brice's series with that.

Jonathan