qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 23/45] target/arm: Implement SME ADDHA, ADDVA


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 23/45] target/arm: Implement SME ADDHA, ADDVA
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:50:41 +0100

On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 05:36, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> v4: Drop restrict.
> ---
>  target/arm/helper-sme.h    |  5 +++
>  target/arm/sme.decode      | 11 +++++
>  target/arm/sme_helper.c    | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target/arm/translate-sme.c | 31 +++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 137 insertions(+)


>  #undef DO_ST
> +
> +void HELPER(sme_addha_s)(void *vzda, void *vzn, void *vpn,
> +                         void *vpm, uint32_t desc)
> +{
> +    intptr_t row, col, oprsz = simd_oprsz(desc) / 4;
> +    uint64_t *pn = vpn, *pm = vpm;
> +    uint32_t *zda = vzda, *zn = vzn;
> +
> +    for (row = 0; row < oprsz; ) {
> +        uint64_t pa = pn[row >> 4];
> +        do {
> +            if (pa & 1) {
> +                for (col = 0; col < oprsz; ) {
> +                    uint64_t pb = pm[col >> 4];
> +                    do {
> +                        if (pb & 1) {
> +                            zda[row * sizeof(ARMVectorReg) + col] += zn[col];
> +                        }
> +                        pb >>= 4;
> +                    } while (++col & 15);
> +                }
> +            }
> +            pa >>= 4;
> +        } while (++row & 15);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void HELPER(sme_addha_d)(void *vzda, void *vzn, void *vpn,
> +                         void *vpm, uint32_t desc)
> +{
> +    intptr_t row, col, oprsz = simd_oprsz(desc) / 8;
> +    uint8_t *pn = vpn, *pm = vpm;
> +    uint64_t *zda = vzda, *zn = vzn;
> +
> +    for (row = 0; row < oprsz; ++row) {
> +        if (pn[H1(row)] & 1) {
> +            for (col = 0; col < oprsz; ++col) {
> +                if (pm[H1(col)] & 1) {
> +                    zda[row * sizeof(ARMVectorReg) + col] += zn[col];
> +                }
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +}

These array index calculations look wrong again?
Should be 'row * (sizeof(ARMVectorReg) / 8) + col' or equivalent,
I think.

> +
> +void HELPER(sme_addva_s)(void *vzda, void *vzn, void *vpn,
> +                         void *vpm, uint32_t desc)
> +{
> +    intptr_t row, col, oprsz = simd_oprsz(desc) / 4;
> +    uint64_t *pn = vpn, *pm = vpm;
> +    uint32_t *zda = vzda, *zn = vzn;
> +
> +    for (row = 0; row < oprsz; ) {
> +        uint64_t pa = pn[row >> 4];
> +        do {
> +            if (pa & 1) {
> +                uint32_t zn_row = zn[row];
> +                for (col = 0; col < oprsz; ) {
> +                    uint64_t pb = pm[col >> 4];
> +                    do {
> +                        if (pb & 1) {
> +                            zda[row * sizeof(ARMVectorReg) + col] += zn_row;
> +                        }
> +                        pb >>= 4;
> +                    } while (++col & 15);
> +                }
> +            }
> +            pa >>= 4;
> +        } while (++row & 15);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void HELPER(sme_addva_d)(void *vzda, void *vzn, void *vpn,
> +                         void *vpm, uint32_t desc)
> +{
> +    intptr_t row, col, oprsz = simd_oprsz(desc) / 8;
> +    uint8_t *pn = vpn, *pm = vpm;
> +    uint64_t *zda = vzda, *zn = vzn;
> +
> +    for (row = 0; row < oprsz; ++row) {
> +        if (pn[H1(row)] & 1) {
> +            uint64_t zn_row = zn[row];
> +            for (col = 0; col < oprsz; ++col) {
> +                if (pm[H1(col)] & 1) {
> +                    zda[row * sizeof(ARMVectorReg) + col] += zn_row;
> +                }
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
> +}

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]