qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] acpi/tests/bits: add SPDX license identifiers for b


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] acpi/tests/bits: add SPDX license identifiers for bios bits tests
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:56:40 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/2.2.6 (2022-06-05)

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:30:05PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> Added the SPDX license identifiers based on the following output from the
> licensee tool for bios bits:
> 
> $ licensee detect bits/
> License:        NOASSERTION
> Matched files:  COPYING
> COPYING:
>   Content hash:  7a1fdfa894728ea69588977442c92073aad69e50
>   License:       NOASSERTION
>   Closest non-matching licenses:
>     BSD-3-Clause-Clear similarity:  85.82%
>     BSD-4-Clause similarity:        83.69%
>     BSD-3-Clause similarity:        77.27%

This report looks pretty bogus to me.

smbios.py license header pretty clearly matches BSD-3-Clause with
99% similarity.

   https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.html

and is pretty different from

   https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause-Clear.html

which adds a statement about patent rights which doens't exist.


If we're going to add SPDX tags to existing files it needs to be
done by a human, not an automated tool. If not possible, we should
leave off SPDX tags, because adding incorrect SPDX tags creates
more harm


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]