[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2022 02:47:59 -0400 |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 01:51:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:39 PM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 5:09 AM
> > > To: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> > > Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> > > Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>;
> > > virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > > Subject: Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 2:52 PM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I found out that the reason why I could not enforce the mtu stems from
> > > > the fact that I did not configure max mtu for the net device
> > > (e.g. through libvirt <mtu size="9000"/>).
> > > > Libvirt does not allow this configuration for vdpa devices and probably
> > > > for a reason. The vdpa backend driver has the freedom to do
> > > it using its copy of virtio_net_config.
> > > >
> > > > The code in qemu that is responsible to allow to consider the device
> > > > MTU restriction is here:
> > > >
> > > > static void virtio_net_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > > > {
> > > > VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(dev);
> > > > VirtIONet *n = VIRTIO_NET(dev);
> > > > NetClientState *nc;
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > if (n->net_conf.mtu) {
> > > > n->host_features |= (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > The above code can be interpreted as follows:
> > > > if the command line arguments of qemu indicates that mtu should be
> > > > limited, then we would read this mtu limitation from the
> > > device (that actual value is ignored).
> > > >
> > > > I worked around this limitation by unconditionally setting
> > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU in the host features. As said, it only indicates that
> > > we should read the actual limitation for the device.
> > > >
> > > > If this makes sense I can send a patch to fix this.
> > >
> > > I wonder whether it's worth to bother:
> > >
> > > 1) mgmt (above libvirt) should have the knowledge to prepare the correct
> > > XML
> > > 2) it's not specific to MTU, we had other features work like, for
> > > example, the multiqueue?
> > >
> >
> >
> > Currently libvirt does not recognize setting the mtu through XML for vdpa
> > device. So you mean the fix should go to libvirt?
>
> Probably.
>
> > Furthermore, even if libvirt supports MTU configuration for a vdpa device,
> > the actual value provided will be ignored and the limitation will be taken
> > from what the vdpa device published in its virtio_net_config structure.
> > That makes the XML configuration binary.
>
> Yes, we suffer from a similar issue for "queues=". I think we should
> fix qemu by failing the initialization if the value provided by cli
> doesn't match what is read from config space.
>
> E.g when mtu=9000 was set by cli but the actual mtu is 1500.
>
> Thanks
Jason most features are passthrough now, no?
Why do you want to make this one special?
> >
> > > Thanks
> >
- Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, (continued)
- Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/07/27
- RE: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Eli Cohen, 2022/07/27
- Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/07/27
- RE: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Eli Cohen, 2022/07/27
- Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/07/27
- RE: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Eli Cohen, 2022/07/28
- Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/07/28
Re: VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU not negotiated, Jason Wang, 2022/07/27