qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] 9pfs: use GHashTable for fid table


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] 9pfs: use GHashTable for fid table
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:10:48 +0200

On Donnerstag, 8. September 2022 13:23:53 CEST Linus Heckemann wrote:
> The previous implementation would iterate over the fid table for
> lookup operations, resulting in an operation with O(n) complexity on
> the number of open files and poor cache locality -- for every open,
> stat, read, write, etc operation.
> 
> This change uses a hashtable for this instead, significantly improving
> the performance of the 9p filesystem. The runtime of NixOS's simple
> installer test, which copies ~122k files totalling ~1.8GiB from 9p,
> decreased by a factor of about 10.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Heckemann <git@sphalerite.org>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> ---

Queued on 9p.next:
https://github.com/cschoenebeck/qemu/commits/9p.next

I retained the BUG_ON() in get_fid(), Greg had a point there that continuing 
to work on a clunked fid would still be a bug.

I also added the suggested TODO comment for g_hash_table_steal_extended(), the 
actual change would be outside the scope of this patch.

And finally I gave this patch a whirl, and what can I say: that's just sick! 
Compiling sources with 9p is boosted by around factor 6..7 here! And running 
9p as root fs also no longer feels sluggish as before. I mean I knew that this 
fid list traversal performance issue existed and had it on my TODO list, but 
the actual impact exceeded my expectation by far.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]