qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:Re: [PATCH] bugfix:migrate with block-dirty-bitmap (disk size is big


From: liuhaiwei9699
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] bugfix:migrate with block-dirty-bitmap (disk size is big enough) can't be finished
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:28:50 +0800 (CST)

Hi ,Vladimir
sometimes ,post-copy mode is not the best choice. For instance, Supposing migrate process will take ten minutes,but network may be interruptted In this process .
If it does happenthe , memory data of VM will be splitted into two parts, and will not be rollback.This is a bad situation

so  migrate-start-postcopy will not be setted in conservative scenario. In this case, the migration with block dirty bitmap may not be finished.


I think  migration of block dirty bitmap should not dependent on post-copy or pre-copy mode.


Best regards
At 2022-09-10 18:18:04, "Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy" <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>On 9/10/22 09:35, liuhaiwei wrote:
>> From: liuhaiwei <liuhaiwei@inspur.com>
>> 
>> bug description as  https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1203
>> Usually,we use the precopy or postcopy mode to migrate block dirty bitmap.
>> but if block-dirty-bitmap size more than threshold size,we cannot entry the migration_completion in migration_iteration_run function
>> To solve this problem, we can setting  the pending size to a fake value(threshold-1 or 0) to tell  migration_iteration_run function to entry the migration_completion,if pending size > threshold size
>> 
>
>
>Actually, bitmaps migrate in postcopy. So, you should start postcopy for it to work (qmp command migrate-start-postcopy). This command simply set the boolean variable, so that in migration_iteration_run() we'll move to postcopy when needed. So, you can start this command immediately after migrate command, or even before it, but after setting the "dirty-bitmaps" capability.
>
>Fake pending is a wrong thing to do, it means that you will make downtime to be larger than expected.
>
>-- 
>Best regards,
>Vladimir

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]