On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 01:51:14PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 1:48 PM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 2:13 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The has_FOO for pointer-valued FOO are redundant, except for arrays.
> > >> They are also a nuisance to work with. Recent commit "qapi: Start to
> > >> elide redundant has_FOO in generated C"
> > >
> > > Commit is referenced using <commit hash 13 chars min> ("commit header")
> >
> > Apply my patches in your tree, and your hashes will differ from mine.
> > Hashes can serve as stable reference only when we git-fetch patches, not
> > when we git-send-email then.
>
> Has the referenced patch not been pushed upstream already? I thought
> it was and hence was asking for the reference.
Err, it is just a few patches earlier in this very series you're
looking at.
Hmm ok. It’s missing from my inbox. Probably was not CC’d to me.