qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 00/12] linux-user patches


From: Helge Deller
Subject: Re: [PULL 00/12] linux-user patches
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 20:52:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.1

On 9/17/22 22:11, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, 17 Sept 2022 at 15:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:

On 17/9/22 16:26, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The close_range(2) man page says:
close_range() first appeared in Linux 5.9.  Library support was added
in glibc in version 2.34.

The qemu-user GitLab CI jobs are failing. For example, see
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3043629417:

../linux-user/syscall.c:8734:26: error: implicit declaration of
function 'close_range' is invalid in C99
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
return get_errno(close_range(arg1, arg2, arg3));
                             ^

There is a second issue with this pull request:
../linux-user/syscall.c:357:16: error: ‘pidfd_getfd’ defined but not
used [-Werror=unused-function]
357 | _syscall3(int, pidfd_getfd, int, pidfd, int, targetfd, unsigned
int, flags);
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~
../linux-user/syscall.c:251:13: note: in definition of macro ‘_syscall3’

See https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3043629434.

Stefan, Thanks for testing those patches!
I'll send a new series with those issues fixed soon.


Hmm apparently this PR hasn't been reviewed (although the patches were
on the list for 2 weeks).

The 'check DCO' job - looking for S-o-b tags -  is green:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3043629425.
Should we complete it by a R-b/A-b check over the commit range?

In some areas there will be no R-b/A-b, so I don't think we can
require those checks.

Was this pull request supposed to go through Laurent instead of being
applied directly by me?

I'm fine with either way :-)

Thanks!
Helge

Btw, I have a whole bunch of additional patches on top of this
series so it would be good to get this series in first...



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]