[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 25/66] target/arm: Add is_secure parameter to do_ats_write
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 25/66] target/arm: Add is_secure parameter to do_ats_write |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:33:55 +0100 |
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 16:54, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Use get_phys_addr_with_secure directly. This is the one place
> where the value of is_secure may not equal arm_is_secure(env).
Is there an implicit "for A-profile" here? Various of the
m_helper.c calls to get_phys_addr() still pass in an mmu_idx
requesting an access for a different security state to that
of the current state of the core, I think.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Other than the commit message,
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
thanks
-- PMM
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 25/66] target/arm: Add is_secure parameter to do_ats_write,
Peter Maydell <=