qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] target/arm/kvm: Retry KVM_CREATE_VM call if it fails EINT


From: Eric Auger
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] target/arm/kvm: Retry KVM_CREATE_VM call if it fails EINTR
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:07:33 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0

Hi Peter,

On 9/27/22 18:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Occasionally the KVM_CREATE_VM ioctl can return EINTR, even though
> there is no pending signal to be taken. In commit 94ccff13382055
> we added a retry-on-EINTR loop to the KVM_CREATE_VM call in the
> generic KVM code. Adopt the same approach for the use of the
> ioctl in the Arm-specific KVM code (where we use it to create a
> scratch VM for probing for various things).
>
> For more information, see the mailing list thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/8735e0s1zw.wl-maz@kernel.org/
>
> Reported-by: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> The view in the thread seems to be that this is a kernel bug (because
> in QEMU's case there shouldn't be a signal to be delivered at this
> point because of our signal handling strategy); so I've adopted the
> same "just retry-on-EINTR for this specific ioctl" approach that
> commit 94ccff13 did, rather than, for instance, something wider like
> "make kvm_ioctl() and friends always retry on EINTR".
>
> v2: correctly check for -1 and errno is EINTR...
> ---
>  target/arm/kvm.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
> index e5c1bd50d29..356199c9e25 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,9 @@ bool kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(const uint32_t 
> *cpus_to_try,
>      if (max_vm_pa_size < 0) {
>          max_vm_pa_size = 0;
>      }
> -    vmfd = ioctl(kvmfd, KVM_CREATE_VM, max_vm_pa_size);
> +    do {
> +        vmfd = ioctl(kvmfd, KVM_CREATE_VM, max_vm_pa_size);
> +    } while (vmfd == -1 && errno == -EINTR);
shouldn't it be errno == EINTR?

Eric
>      if (vmfd < 0) {
>          goto err;
>      }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]